Decreasing radiation exposure in interventional pediatric cardiology: a 10-year European single-center analysis of 3683 procedures

BACKGROUND: To evaluate radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization over a 10-year period at a central European tertiary center and to establish contemporary, procedure-specific dose benchmarks and conversion factors for estimating effective dose (ED). METHODS: All cardiac catheterization procedures in patients < 18 years performed between 2015 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. For procedures with multiple components, cumulative dose area product (DAP) was proportionally allocated using weight-adjusted (DAP/BW) median values from single-intervention cases. ED was estimated in silico in randomly selected examinations using Monte Carlo simulation. Dose conversion factors between DAP and ED were derived. Additionally, a structured review of the literature on recently published data on radiation doses was performed. RESULTS: /kg for interventional procedures. For most procedure types, DAP/BW was substantially lower than previously published benchmarks. Simulated conversion factors declined logarithmically with increasing body weight and differed only slightly between posterior-anterior and lateral projections. Only 0.9% of patients exceeded a cumulative ED of 30 mSv. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure in contemporary pediatric cardiac catheterization is markedly lower than in earlier reports, with procedure complexity being the primary determinant of effective dose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-02907-5
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decreasing radiation exposure in interventional pediatric cardiology: a 10-year European single-center analysis of 3683 procedures

Felix Teske, Florentine Gräfe, Maciej Rosołowski, Daniel Gräfe et al.
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Decreasing radiation exposure in interventional pediatric cardiology: a 10-year European single-center analysis of 3683 procedures

Felix Teske, Florentine Gräfe, Maciej Rosołowski, Daniel Gräfe, Ingo Dähnert, Frank-Thomas Riede
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization over a 10-year period at a central European tertiary center and to establish contemporary, procedure-specific dose benchmarks and conversion factors for estimating effective dose (ED). METHODS: All cardiac catheterization procedures in patients < 18 years performed between 2015 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. For procedures with multiple components, cumulative dose area product (DAP) was proportionally allocated using weight-adjusted (DAP/BW) median values from single-intervention cases. ED was estimated in silico in randomly selected examinations using Monte Carlo simulation. Dose conversion factors between DAP and ED were derived. Additionally, a structured review of the literature on recently published data on radiation doses was performed. RESULTS: /kg for interventional procedures. For most procedure types, DAP/BW was substantially lower than previously published benchmarks. Simulated conversion factors declined logarithmically with increasing body weight and differed only slightly between posterior-anterior and lateral projections. Only 0.9% of patients exceeded a cumulative ED of 30 mSv. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure in contemporary pediatric cardiac catheterization is markedly lower than in earlier reports, with procedure complexity being the primary determinant of effective dose.

Clinical Research in Cardiology
Leipzig Heart Institute (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.