Prepregnancy Lifestyle Risk Factors in Women Seeking Digital Fertility Services: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 3 pregnancies in the United States are complicated by one or more adverse pregnancy outcomes. This high prevalence contributes to the elevated rates of maternal and infant mortality in the United States. Modifiable prepregnancy or preconception lifestyle factors have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in observational studies, which underscores the importance of preconception care. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed to (1) estimate the prevalence of preconception lifestyle risk factors among women seeking services from a digital fertility platform, (2) characterize the study population and present relevant reference data, and (3) examine the distribution of prepregnancy lifestyle scores across demographic and clinical subgroups. METHODS: , not currently smoking, ≥150 min/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity, healthy eating, no daily alcohol intake, and use of a prenatal multivitamin. RESULTS: The study population was racially and ethnically diverse, with a mean age of 32.9 (SD 6.3) years. Most (235/396, 59%) participants received a composite score of 3 factors or fewer, and less than 5% (19/396) scored 6 out of 6. For context, this cohort had higher proportions of participants with unhealthy BMI and dietary patterns than those in the reference data. Regarding fertility, 46% (182/396) met the clinical definition of infertility (≥1 year trying to conceive), with the prevalence of infertility ranging from 16% (3/19) among those with the highest lifestyle scores to 59% (17/29) among those with the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: Most women seeking services from this digital fertility platform exhibited multiple lifestyle factors that have been previously associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in observational studies. These results suggest that nearly all survey participants have potential risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes and therefore the potential to adopt at least one improvement in their lifestyle behavior. A digital platform may offer an accessible mechanism for identifying and characterizing preconception risk factors; however, future longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether platform-based interventions can effectively support behavior change and improve maternal health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/83023
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prepregnancy Lifestyle Risk Factors in Women Seeking Digital Fertility Services: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Nara Lee, Tanvi Suresh, Peter N. Schlegel, Jorge Chavarro et al.
JMIR Formative Research
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Prepregnancy Lifestyle Risk Factors in Women Seeking Digital Fertility Services: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Nara Lee, Tanvi Suresh, Peter N. Schlegel, Jorge Chavarro, Audrey Jane Gaskins
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 3 pregnancies in the United States are complicated by one or more adverse pregnancy outcomes. This high prevalence contributes to the elevated rates of maternal and infant mortality in the United States. Modifiable prepregnancy or preconception lifestyle factors have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in observational studies, which underscores the importance of preconception care. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed to (1) estimate the prevalence of preconception lifestyle risk factors among women seeking services from a digital fertility platform, (2) characterize the study population and present relevant reference data, and (3) examine the distribution of prepregnancy lifestyle scores across demographic and clinical subgroups. METHODS: , not currently smoking, ≥150 min/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity, healthy eating, no daily alcohol intake, and use of a prenatal multivitamin. RESULTS: The study population was racially and ethnically diverse, with a mean age of 32.9 (SD 6.3) years. Most (235/396, 59%) participants received a composite score of 3 factors or fewer, and less than 5% (19/396) scored 6 out of 6. For context, this cohort had higher proportions of participants with unhealthy BMI and dietary patterns than those in the reference data. Regarding fertility, 46% (182/396) met the clinical definition of infertility (≥1 year trying to conceive), with the prevalence of infertility ranging from 16% (3/19) among those with the highest lifestyle scores to 59% (17/29) among those with the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: Most women seeking services from this digital fertility platform exhibited multiple lifestyle factors that have been previously associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in observational studies. These results suggest that nearly all survey participants have potential risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes and therefore the potential to adopt at least one improvement in their lifestyle behavior. A digital platform may offer an accessible mechanism for identifying and characterizing preconception risk factors; however, future longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether platform-based interventions can effectively support behavior change and improve maternal health outcomes.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 10
Gay Men's Health Crisis (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), New Hope Fertility Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.