Non-Trade in the MENA Revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis

This paper provides a historical perspective on comparatively low levels of trade in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, focusing on studies addressing the impact of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Our literature review identifies best practices and reviews trade potential estimates and finds that the last year for which a relevant trade potential estimate for the region accounting for the influence of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is available is 1999. First, we replicate the seminal study that provided the earliest estimation of trade potential. Next, we extend and update this study, using a best practice panel PPML gravity model with ex(/im)porter-year fixed effects for 76 countries (1991–2019 inclusive). Finally, we use two alternative approaches to estimate the intra-MENA trade potential that could have been reaped as a consequence of a geopolitically more stable and open Middle East (ME). In the year 2019, this ‘pot of gold’ (POG) in per cent of intra-MENA trade amounted to 10% to 54% (import-based) and 21% to 48% (export-based), substantially lower than earlier literature reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economies
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040121
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Trade in the MENA Revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis

Binyam Afewerk Demena, Peter A. G. van Bergeijk, Libby Lahar
Economies
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Non-Trade in the MENA Revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis

Binyam Afewerk Demena, Peter A. G. van Bergeijk, Libby Lahar
article en

Abstract

This paper provides a historical perspective on comparatively low levels of trade in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, focusing on studies addressing the impact of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Our literature review identifies best practices and reviews trade potential estimates and finds that the last year for which a relevant trade potential estimate for the region accounting for the influence of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is available is 1999. First, we replicate the seminal study that provided the earliest estimation of trade potential. Next, we extend and update this study, using a best practice panel PPML gravity model with ex(/im)porter-year fixed effects for 76 countries (1991–2019 inclusive). Finally, we use two alternative approaches to estimate the intra-MENA trade potential that could have been reaped as a consequence of a geopolitically more stable and open Middle East (ME). In the year 2019, this ‘pot of gold’ (POG) in per cent of intra-MENA trade amounted to 10% to 54% (import-based) and 21% to 48% (export-based), substantially lower than earlier literature reports.

EconomiesVol. 14(4)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), International Institute of Social History (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-Trade in the MENA Revisited: A Gravity Model Analysis — Binyam Afewerk Demena, Peter A. G. van Bergeijk, et al. · Economies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS