Do re‐employment bonuses increase employment? Evidence from the Idaho Return to Work Bonus programme

Abstract In June 2020, Idaho announced the Return to Work Bonus (RWB) programme, which provided residents who returned to work with bonuses of up to $1500. We present difference‐in‐differences, triple differences, event studies and synthetic control estimates suggesting that the programme may have supported employment and workforce participation following its enactment. For example, from difference‐in‐differences estimates, we find that the employment–population ratio rose by 3.6 percentage points, the unemployment rate fell by 0.7 percentage points, and the non‐participation rate fell by 2.9 percentage points in Idaho relative to other states following the introduction of the RWB programme. If these results from Idaho were to generalize to the economy as a whole, then they would not be enough to arrest a moderate recession, but they would meaningfully accelerate labour market recovery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to study the effects of re‐employment bonuses on the US labour market outside an experimental setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70041
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do re‐employment bonuses increase employment? Evidence from the Idaho Return to Work Bonus programme

Duncan Hobbs, Michael R. Strain
Economica
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Do re‐employment bonuses increase employment? Evidence from the Idaho Return to Work Bonus programme

Duncan Hobbs, Michael R. Strain
article en

Abstract

Abstract In June 2020, Idaho announced the Return to Work Bonus (RWB) programme, which provided residents who returned to work with bonuses of up to $1500. We present difference‐in‐differences, triple differences, event studies and synthetic control estimates suggesting that the programme may have supported employment and workforce participation following its enactment. For example, from difference‐in‐differences estimates, we find that the employment–population ratio rose by 3.6 percentage points, the unemployment rate fell by 0.7 percentage points, and the non‐participation rate fell by 2.9 percentage points in Idaho relative to other states following the introduction of the RWB programme. If these results from Idaho were to generalize to the economy as a whole, then they would not be enough to arrest a moderate recession, but they would meaningfully accelerate labour market recovery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to study the effects of re‐employment bonuses on the US labour market outside an experimental setting.

Economica
American Enterprise Institute (US), Georgetown University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do re‐employment bonuses increase employment? Evidence from the Idaho Return to Work Bonus programme — Duncan Hobbs, Michael R. Strain · Economica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS