Comparative performance evaluation of biomass chemical looping against conventional gasification technologies

• CLG comprehensively benchmarked against conventional gasification systems. • Nickel smelter slag catalyzed reforming reactions to enhance CLG performance. • CLG with steam surpassed conventional system: +30% gas yield and +14% efficiency. • CLG without steam showed similar performance to conventional gasification. Biomass chemical looping gasification (BCLG) is emerging as a promising alternative to conventional gasification, addressing inherent limitations. This study systematically compares BCLG with conventional methods like air and air/steam gasification, using pine forest residue in an allothermal fluidized bed reactor. Key operational parameters such as reactor temperature (800–900 °C), equivalence ratio (0.18–0.36) and steam-to-biomass ratio (1.3) were examined. Performance indicators such as gas composition, yields, carbon conversion, and cold gas efficiency were evaluated and compared. BCLG without steam displayed similar performance to conventional methods. However, the performance of BCLG with steam surpassed conventional gasification methods and emerged as the most promising process. The results suggest enhanced catalytic performance of nickel smelter slag for reforming reactions under steam-rich conditions, with H 2 /CO ratio, product gas yield, cold gas and carbon conversion efficiency improved by approximately 111%, 30%, 14% and 2%, respectively, compared to air/steam gasification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101828
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative performance evaluation of biomass chemical looping against conventional gasification technologies

Avishek Goel, Jochen Ströhle, Jukka Konttinen, Fabiola Panitz et al.
Energy Conversion and Management X
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Comparative performance evaluation of biomass chemical looping against conventional gasification technologies

Avishek Goel, Jochen Ströhle, Jukka Konttinen, Fabiola Panitz, Bernd Epple, Elyas M. Moghaddam, Chao He
article en

Abstract

• CLG comprehensively benchmarked against conventional gasification systems. • Nickel smelter slag catalyzed reforming reactions to enhance CLG performance. • CLG with steam surpassed conventional system: +30% gas yield and +14% efficiency. • CLG without steam showed similar performance to conventional gasification. Biomass chemical looping gasification (BCLG) is emerging as a promising alternative to conventional gasification, addressing inherent limitations. This study systematically compares BCLG with conventional methods like air and air/steam gasification, using pine forest residue in an allothermal fluidized bed reactor. Key operational parameters such as reactor temperature (800–900 °C), equivalence ratio (0.18–0.36) and steam-to-biomass ratio (1.3) were examined. Performance indicators such as gas composition, yields, carbon conversion, and cold gas efficiency were evaluated and compared. BCLG without steam displayed similar performance to conventional methods. However, the performance of BCLG with steam surpassed conventional gasification methods and emerged as the most promising process. The results suggest enhanced catalytic performance of nickel smelter slag for reforming reactions under steam-rich conditions, with H 2 /CO ratio, product gas yield, cold gas and carbon conversion efficiency improved by approximately 111%, 30%, 14% and 2%, respectively, compared to air/steam gasification.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 30
Tampere University (FI), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Academy of Finland, Tampereen Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.