How do different types of institutions shape corporate environmental, social and governance performance?

Purpose This study aims to investigate the institutional determinants of firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Drawing on stakeholder and institutional theories, the authors examine how three distinct types of national institutions – formal, informal and financial market institutions – shape firms’ ESG performance. By analyzing the differential effects of these institutional types on each component of ESG performance, the study offers a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between institutional environments and corporate social performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors developed and tested a multi-source data set analyzing the ESG performance of 3,872 firms across 49 countries over 15 years (2002–2016) using data from the ASSET4 database. To assess the relationships between the three types of institutions and firms’ ESG performance, the authors used multilevel random-effects models with lagged independent variables. Findings This research provides a comprehensive analysis that links specific types of institutions to each component of ESG performance, rather than to aggregate corporate social responsibility performance. It advances stakeholder and institutional theories by demonstrating how distinct stakeholder groups – represented through different institutional arrangements – shape specific ESG outcomes, thereby offering valuable insights for policymakers and managers. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive examination of how distinct types of institutions are linked to individual ESG dimensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multinational Business Review
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-06-2025-0216
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do different types of institutions shape corporate environmental, social and governance performance?

Chang Hoon Oh, Y. D. Kim, Gabriel Younseo Jo, Jiyoung Shin
Multinational Business Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How do different types of institutions shape corporate environmental, social and governance performance?

Chang Hoon Oh, Y. D. Kim, Gabriel Younseo Jo, Jiyoung Shin
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the institutional determinants of firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Drawing on stakeholder and institutional theories, the authors examine how three distinct types of national institutions – formal, informal and financial market institutions – shape firms’ ESG performance. By analyzing the differential effects of these institutional types on each component of ESG performance, the study offers a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between institutional environments and corporate social performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors developed and tested a multi-source data set analyzing the ESG performance of 3,872 firms across 49 countries over 15 years (2002–2016) using data from the ASSET4 database. To assess the relationships between the three types of institutions and firms’ ESG performance, the authors used multilevel random-effects models with lagged independent variables. Findings This research provides a comprehensive analysis that links specific types of institutions to each component of ESG performance, rather than to aggregate corporate social responsibility performance. It advances stakeholder and institutional theories by demonstrating how distinct stakeholder groups – represented through different institutional arrangements – shape specific ESG outcomes, thereby offering valuable insights for policymakers and managers. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive examination of how distinct types of institutions are linked to individual ESG dimensions.

Multinational Business Review
University of Kansas (US), Incheon National University (KR), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.