Publicly available multimodal large language models for ocular surface infections: benchmarking against corneal specialists in triage, diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ocular surface infections remain a major cause of visual loss worldwide, yet diagnosis often relies on slow or insensitive microbiological techniques. Artificial intelligence may complement emerging molecular tools by supporting rapid triage and diagnostic reasoning. This study benchmarked publicly available multimodal large language models (LLMs) against corneal specialists for the diagnosis, treatment and urgency triage of infectious keratitis and conjunctivitis. METHODS: A single-centre diagnostic-accuracy study included 60 microbiologically confirmed infectious keratitis and conjunctivitis cases, each comprising a slit-lamp photograph and a paired clinical vignette. Six multimodal LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-5, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Grok) were evaluated for diagnosis, treatment and urgency triage under three input conditions (image-only, text-only and image+text). Outputs were compared with two corneal specialists. RESULTS: LLM performance depended strongly on input modality. Image-only accuracy was lowest (best GPT-5, 61.4%; κ=0.38) with frequent misclassification of fungal and Acanthamoeba keratitis and hallucinations confined to this setting. Text input improved results (GPT-5, 83.3%; κ=0.78), though accuracy remained below specialists (87-90%; κ≈0.8). Combined image+text achieved near-human accuracy without consistently surpassing corneal specialists (Perplexity 96.7%; κ=0.95; GPT-5 91.7%; κ=0.87). Treatment accuracy remained lower (81-85% vs 90-98%), while urgency triage matched experts in multimodal input. CONCLUSION: Publicly accessible multimodal LLMs can approach expert-level performance in diagnosis and triage when provided with clinical context and slit-lamp images. Gaps in therapeutic reasoning and rare pathogen recognition underscore the need for targeted refinement and validation. These models may complement specialist care, supporting rapid triage and integration with molecular or metagenomic diagnostics, especially in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328867
Primary Topic
Ocular Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publicly available multimodal large language models for ocular surface infections: benchmarking against corneal specialists in triage, diagnosis and treatment

Francisco Javier Gómez‐Romero, Sergio Copete, Carlos Campo-Beamud, Alfonso Ruiz et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Ocular Infections and Treatments
article

Publicly available multimodal large language models for ocular surface infections: benchmarking against corneal specialists in triage, diagnosis and treatment

Francisco Javier Gómez‐Romero, Sergio Copete, Carlos Campo-Beamud, Alfonso Ruiz, Esther Campo Beamud, Jesús Bastante Quijano
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ocular surface infections remain a major cause of visual loss worldwide, yet diagnosis often relies on slow or insensitive microbiological techniques. Artificial intelligence may complement emerging molecular tools by supporting rapid triage and diagnostic reasoning. This study benchmarked publicly available multimodal large language models (LLMs) against corneal specialists for the diagnosis, treatment and urgency triage of infectious keratitis and conjunctivitis. METHODS: A single-centre diagnostic-accuracy study included 60 microbiologically confirmed infectious keratitis and conjunctivitis cases, each comprising a slit-lamp photograph and a paired clinical vignette. Six multimodal LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-5, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Grok) were evaluated for diagnosis, treatment and urgency triage under three input conditions (image-only, text-only and image+text). Outputs were compared with two corneal specialists. RESULTS: LLM performance depended strongly on input modality. Image-only accuracy was lowest (best GPT-5, 61.4%; κ=0.38) with frequent misclassification of fungal and Acanthamoeba keratitis and hallucinations confined to this setting. Text input improved results (GPT-5, 83.3%; κ=0.78), though accuracy remained below specialists (87-90%; κ≈0.8). Combined image+text achieved near-human accuracy without consistently surpassing corneal specialists (Perplexity 96.7%; κ=0.95; GPT-5 91.7%; κ=0.87). Treatment accuracy remained lower (81-85% vs 90-98%), while urgency triage matched experts in multimodal input. CONCLUSION: Publicly accessible multimodal LLMs can approach expert-level performance in diagnosis and triage when provided with clinical context and slit-lamp images. Gaps in therapeutic reasoning and rare pathogen recognition underscore the need for targeted refinement and validation. These models may complement specialist care, supporting rapid triage and integration with molecular or metagenomic diagnostics, especially in resource-limited settings.

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ocular Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.