e-Mental Health Intervention Preferences Among Informal Caregivers of Adults Living with Chronic Kidney Disease: Semistructured Interview Study

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease commonly experience mental health difficulties. However, there is currently limited access to scalable psychological interventions such as those using e-mental health platforms. Furthermore, there is an absence of such interventions tailored for this group of caregivers, which may limit acceptability. OBJECTIVE: To inform future e-mental health intervention development, this study aimed to explore preferences for e-mental health interventions among informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: A total of 13 informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease participated in semistructured interviews. Eligible informal caregivers lived in the United Kingdom and were recruited via nonprofit organizations and social media advertisements. Semistructured interviews followed a topic guide exploring caregivers' e-mental health intervention preferences. Data were analyzed using manifest content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4 categories and 13 subcategories were generated. "Design preferences" illustrates key intervention design features that were important to caregivers, such as involving caregivers and other interest-holders in the design process. "Content preferences" describes the information caregivers valued in an intervention, such as information about chronic kidney disease and resources to support caregivers. "Support preferences" reflects the characteristics of support caregivers preferred if support was available as part of the intervention, such as peer support and providing support that accommodates individual preferences. Lastly, "Dissemination preferences" describes methods caregivers recommended to promote intervention uptake, such as engaging communication strategies and trusted and accessible sources of information. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers identified a number of e-mental health intervention design and delivery preferences that should be considered when developing e-mental health interventions for caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease. To ensure such interventions are acceptable, feasible, and relevant, co-design approaches should be adopted during the intervention development process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Human Factors
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/80962
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

e-Mental Health Intervention Preferences Among Informal Caregivers of Adults Living with Chronic Kidney Disease: Semistructured Interview Study

Louise von Essén, Paul Farrand, Chelsea Coumoundouros, Joanne Woodford et al.
JMIR Human Factors
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

e-Mental Health Intervention Preferences Among Informal Caregivers of Adults Living with Chronic Kidney Disease: Semistructured Interview Study

Louise von Essén, Paul Farrand, Chelsea Coumoundouros, Joanne Woodford, Robbert Sanderman, Abla Sami
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease commonly experience mental health difficulties. However, there is currently limited access to scalable psychological interventions such as those using e-mental health platforms. Furthermore, there is an absence of such interventions tailored for this group of caregivers, which may limit acceptability. OBJECTIVE: To inform future e-mental health intervention development, this study aimed to explore preferences for e-mental health interventions among informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: A total of 13 informal caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease participated in semistructured interviews. Eligible informal caregivers lived in the United Kingdom and were recruited via nonprofit organizations and social media advertisements. Semistructured interviews followed a topic guide exploring caregivers' e-mental health intervention preferences. Data were analyzed using manifest content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4 categories and 13 subcategories were generated. "Design preferences" illustrates key intervention design features that were important to caregivers, such as involving caregivers and other interest-holders in the design process. "Content preferences" describes the information caregivers valued in an intervention, such as information about chronic kidney disease and resources to support caregivers. "Support preferences" reflects the characteristics of support caregivers preferred if support was available as part of the intervention, such as peer support and providing support that accommodates individual preferences. Lastly, "Dissemination preferences" describes methods caregivers recommended to promote intervention uptake, such as engaging communication strategies and trusted and accessible sources of information. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers identified a number of e-mental health intervention design and delivery preferences that should be considered when developing e-mental health interventions for caregivers of people living with chronic kidney disease. To ensure such interventions are acceptable, feasible, and relevant, co-design approaches should be adopted during the intervention development process.

JMIR Human FactorsVol. 13
Uppsala University (SE), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.