Human expertise and artificial intelligence in coaching: A comparative analysis of feedback for triathlon front crawl technique

Recent advances in AI create new opportunities for performance analysis in endurance sports. This study compared expert human coaching with GPT-4o in biomechanical analysis and technique feedback for triathlon front crawl. Fifteen certified coaches and an AI agent analysed a 25-frame video of an intermediate triathlete completing one stroke cycle. Both identified errors, prioritised corrections, and suggested drills to address them. Responses were thematically analysed and mapped to four stroke phases: glide, pull, push, and recovery, within a structured feedback framework based on a deterministic biomechanical model. Human coaches emphasised holistic aspects (such as breathing, alignment, and rhythm), while AI provided detailed biomechanical cues (e.g., early vertical forearm, stroke length) and drill-specific recommendations. Agreement was strongest on high-impact errors in the catch phase. Findings suggest that AI can complement coaching by enhancing error detection, providing structured feedback, and reducing cognitive load, while preserving the coach's role in contextual adaptation and individualised strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261435125
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human expertise and artificial intelligence in coaching: A comparative analysis of feedback for triathlon front crawl technique

Eyal Weissblueth, Alon Hirsh, Ifat Linder
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Human expertise and artificial intelligence in coaching: A comparative analysis of feedback for triathlon front crawl technique

Eyal Weissblueth, Alon Hirsh, Ifat Linder
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in AI create new opportunities for performance analysis in endurance sports. This study compared expert human coaching with GPT-4o in biomechanical analysis and technique feedback for triathlon front crawl. Fifteen certified coaches and an AI agent analysed a 25-frame video of an intermediate triathlete completing one stroke cycle. Both identified errors, prioritised corrections, and suggested drills to address them. Responses were thematically analysed and mapped to four stroke phases: glide, pull, push, and recovery, within a structured feedback framework based on a deterministic biomechanical model. Human coaches emphasised holistic aspects (such as breathing, alignment, and rhythm), while AI provided detailed biomechanical cues (e.g., early vertical forearm, stroke length) and drill-specific recommendations. Agreement was strongest on high-impact errors in the catch phase. Findings suggest that AI can complement coaching by enhancing error detection, providing structured feedback, and reducing cognitive load, while preserving the coach's role in contextual adaptation and individualised strategies.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Migal - Galilee Technology Center (IL), Tel Hai Academic College (IL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.