Unintended Doses: How Livestock Insurance Fuels Antibiotic Use on Chinese Hog Farms?

ABSTRACT While antibiotics boost livestock productivity and reduce disease risk, their overuse raises public health concerns, notably antimicrobial resistance. This study examines livestock insurance as an alternative to direct regulation of antibiotic use, like bans or prescription mandates. We present a framework showing how insurance interacts with antibiotics' dual roles, both risk‐reducing and risk‐increasing, and test it using a natural policy experiment in China. Using survey and insurance data, we apply difference‐in‐differences models and find that insurance significantly increases antibiotic use among hog farmers. This suggests antibiotics act as risk‐increasing inputs at current levels. Our findings highlight the need to align insurance with sustainable livestock and antibiotic stewardship strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70093
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unintended Doses: How Livestock Insurance Fuels Antibiotic Use on Chinese Hog Farms?

Qingyin Cai, Calum G. Turvey, Xudong Rao
Agribusiness
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

Unintended Doses: How Livestock Insurance Fuels Antibiotic Use on Chinese Hog Farms?

Qingyin Cai, Calum G. Turvey, Xudong Rao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT While antibiotics boost livestock productivity and reduce disease risk, their overuse raises public health concerns, notably antimicrobial resistance. This study examines livestock insurance as an alternative to direct regulation of antibiotic use, like bans or prescription mandates. We present a framework showing how insurance interacts with antibiotics' dual roles, both risk‐reducing and risk‐increasing, and test it using a natural policy experiment in China. Using survey and insurance data, we apply difference‐in‐differences models and find that insurance significantly increases antibiotic use among hog farmers. This suggests antibiotics act as risk‐increasing inputs at current levels. Our findings highlight the need to align insurance with sustainable livestock and antibiotic stewardship strategies.

Agribusiness
Louisiana State University (US), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.