Evaluating the utility of feature importance visualizations in SHAP

Feature importance is a technique that helps users understand machine learning models by showing how much each feature contributed to the model’s predictions. For example, it can be used for housing price prediction to explain why certain features lead to higher or lower prices. Different visualizations are used to convey feature importance to users: standard bar charts, but also advanced waterfall plots and force plots as provided by SHAP. These advanced visual representations convey more information (e.g., about the additivity property of the technique). However, this may come at the expense of the figure’s simplicity. Both the trade-off between these properties and the added benefit of these advanced visualizations have yet to be formally studied. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of three common SHAP visualization types for users to understand how machine learning-based prediction works in a housing price prediction scenario. Each participant answered a set of quiz questions aimed to measure their basic understanding of the feature importance (the absolute impact of features), the negative or positive impact of features, and the additivity property of feature importance. By testing whether participants understood these concepts, we assert whether the advanced visual metaphors are effective in conveying additional information beyond the standard bar chart visualization. Moreover, we study whether the effectiveness is moderated by personal characteristics, such as an individual’s visual familiarity and cognitive skills. Our results from 2 user experiments comprising 546 participants in total show that, despite testing specifically for the properties that waterfall plots emphasize, bar and waterfall plots perform equally well. Force plots seemed to perform worse, and these results were independent of the skills and experience of the participants. Therefore, our findings tentatively suggest that bar charts may be a preferable choice for communicating feature importance due to their simplicity and comparable effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Visualization
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14738716261434842
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the utility of feature importance visualizations in SHAP

Jarke J. van Wijk, Yu Liang, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Martijn C. Willemsen et al.
Information Visualization
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Evaluating the utility of feature importance visualizations in SHAP

Jarke J. van Wijk, Yu Liang, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Martijn C. Willemsen, Dennis Collaris
article en

Abstract

Feature importance is a technique that helps users understand machine learning models by showing how much each feature contributed to the model’s predictions. For example, it can be used for housing price prediction to explain why certain features lead to higher or lower prices. Different visualizations are used to convey feature importance to users: standard bar charts, but also advanced waterfall plots and force plots as provided by SHAP. These advanced visual representations convey more information (e.g., about the additivity property of the technique). However, this may come at the expense of the figure’s simplicity. Both the trade-off between these properties and the added benefit of these advanced visualizations have yet to be formally studied. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of three common SHAP visualization types for users to understand how machine learning-based prediction works in a housing price prediction scenario. Each participant answered a set of quiz questions aimed to measure their basic understanding of the feature importance (the absolute impact of features), the negative or positive impact of features, and the additivity property of feature importance. By testing whether participants understood these concepts, we assert whether the advanced visual metaphors are effective in conveying additional information beyond the standard bar chart visualization. Moreover, we study whether the effectiveness is moderated by personal characteristics, such as an individual’s visual familiarity and cognitive skills. Our results from 2 user experiments comprising 546 participants in total show that, despite testing specifically for the properties that waterfall plots emphasize, bar and waterfall plots perform equally well. Force plots seemed to perform worse, and these results were independent of the skills and experience of the participants. Therefore, our findings tentatively suggest that bar charts may be a preferable choice for communicating feature importance due to their simplicity and comparable effectiveness.

Information Visualization
Utrecht University (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.