ADC target profiling in NSCLC: Generalizable AI separates TROP-2 and cMET phenotypes
BACKGROUND: Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting TROP-2 and cMET are entering clinical trials in NSCLC. Their translation depends on reliable biomarker assessment, a task still dominated by subjective visual scoring and inconsistent reproducibility. METHODS: We built a modular AI pipeline that detects cells, classifies carcinoma cells, and quantifies membranous and cytoplasmic expression. A membranous scorer trained on TROP-2 was applied zero-shot to cMET, HER2, and PD-L1. The analysis covered 1,142 resected NSCLCs, integrating expression maps with clinicopathologic, molecular, and tumor microenvironment (TME) features. RESULTS: The AI scorer recapitulated pathologist annotations with near-perfect correlation (r = 0.98-0.99, ρ = 97-98, τ = 0.88-0.89, CCC = 0.97-0.98) for TROP-2 and generalized to other markers (cMET r = 0.99, ρ = 0.96, τ = 0.91, CCC = 0.96; HER2 r = 0.93, ρ = 0.72, τ = 0.60, CCC = 0.92; and PD-L1 [TPS] r = 0.85, ρ = 0.84, τ = 0.68, CCC = 0.82 / [H-score] r = 0.87, ρ = 0.86, τ = 0.70, CCC = 0.85). Its agreement with six pathologists matched interobserver variability (0.86-0.96). Expression maps revealed contrasting spatial and cellular patterns: TROP-2 dominated LUSC (mean H-Scores 141.3/103.2 vs. 74.5/45.7 in LUAD for membrane/cytoplasm) and marked immune-deserted tumors. cMET prevailed in LUAD (mean 50.4 vs. 20.6 in LUSC), co-localized with fibroblast-rich, immune-active TME and KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Foundation model-based scoring produces expert-level, scalable biomarker quantification. The resulting TME phenotypes - TROP-2-high immune-deserted vs cMET-high, immune-active - reveal therapeutic implications for combining ADCs with immunotherapies or kinase inhibitors.
Authors
- Reinhard Büttner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8806-4786)
- Rosemarie Krupar
- Marie‐Lisa Eich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-4598)
- Philipp Seegerer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-7991)
- Lukas Ruff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9707-297X)
- S. Merkelbach-Bruse
- Kai Standvoss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-6726)
- Evelyn Ramberger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-2696)
- K. Hekmat
- Matthias Heldwein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-795X)
- Georg Schlachtenberger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-8432)
- Cornelius Böhm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3754-4182)
- Simon Schallenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-7116)
- Frederick Klauschen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-2389)
- Xizi Liang
- Katja Lingelbach
- Ulrich Keilholz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-9406)
- Stephan Tietz
- Gabriel Dernbach
- N. Frost
- Lars Tharun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-0775)
- Jens‐Carsten Rückert
- Suhas Pandhe
- Christian Grohé (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-7647)
- Verena Aumiller
- David Horst
- Julika Ribbat-Idel
- Marvin Sextro
- Sandip Ghosh
- Maximilian Alber
- Alexander Quaas
Institutions
- TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Alacris (Germany) (DE)
- Berlin Centre of Competence for Water (DE)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
- Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch (DE)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2026-04-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4513
- Primary Topic
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00