Quantifying Adsorbed Oil Content and Controlling Factors in Lacustrine Shales of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation: Insights from T <sub>1</sub> –T <sub>2</sub> NMR Experiments, Multitemperature Pyrolysis and Solvent Extraction Experiments

Accurate evaluation of adsorbed oil heterogeneity in laminated shales is critical for optimizing shale oil recovery and challenging assumptions of inherently low recovery potential in such reservoirs. This study integrates geochemical, petrophysical, and microscopic analyses to systematically investigate the compositional heterogeneity, storage mechanisms, and controlling factors of adsorbed oil within the Paleogene Shahejie Formation (Bohai Bay Basin), implementing T1–T2 NMR at tailored relaxation time thresholds for adsorbed oil characterization. Results reveal pronounced heterogeneity, with adsorbed oil concentrations significantly higher in organic- and clay-rich bright laminae than in massive or bioturbated facies, which act as preferential storage sites due to enhanced nanoporosity (10–50 nm mesopores), surface area (R2 = 0.77), and synergistic mineral-organic interactions (TOC: R2 = 0.75; clay content: R2 = 0.88). Adsorbed oil is enriched in C19+ n-alkanes, resins, and asphaltenes, retained via π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals forces. Methodologically, multitemperature pyrolysis (S′2–1+S′2–2) yields movable oil of 0.06–8.82 mg/g (average 2.14 mg/g) but underestimates adsorbed oil by 40–50% (vs NMR), while solvent extraction also shows substantial deviations; T1–T2 NMR (0.013–0.022 mg/L, average 0.0165 mg/L) demonstrates superior sensitivity, primarily due to hydrocarbon volatilization (50–60% loss) during pyrolysis sample preparation. These findings refine sweet spot identification in laminated shale reservoirs, underscoring the need for method-specific calibration and correction factors to reconcile analytical discrepancies for improved movable oil estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c06553
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Adsorbed Oil Content and Controlling Factors in Lacustrine Shales of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation: Insights from T 1 –T 2 NMR Experiments, Multitemperature Pyrolysis and Solvent Extraction Experiments

Xiaoping Liu, Quansheng Guan, Gaohang Jia, Xianzheng Zhao et al.
Energy & Fuels
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Quantifying Adsorbed Oil Content and Controlling Factors in Lacustrine Shales of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation: Insights from T 1 –T 2 NMR Experiments, Multitemperature Pyrolysis and Solvent Extraction Experiments

Xiaoping Liu, Quansheng Guan, Gaohang Jia, Xianzheng Zhao, Murray Gingras, Wenya Jiang, Fengming Jin, Biao Sun
article en

Abstract

Accurate evaluation of adsorbed oil heterogeneity in laminated shales is critical for optimizing shale oil recovery and challenging assumptions of inherently low recovery potential in such reservoirs. This study integrates geochemical, petrophysical, and microscopic analyses to systematically investigate the compositional heterogeneity, storage mechanisms, and controlling factors of adsorbed oil within the Paleogene Shahejie Formation (Bohai Bay Basin), implementing T1–T2 NMR at tailored relaxation time thresholds for adsorbed oil characterization. Results reveal pronounced heterogeneity, with adsorbed oil concentrations significantly higher in organic- and clay-rich bright laminae than in massive or bioturbated facies, which act as preferential storage sites due to enhanced nanoporosity (10–50 nm mesopores), surface area (R2 = 0.77), and synergistic mineral-organic interactions (TOC: R2 = 0.75; clay content: R2 = 0.88). Adsorbed oil is enriched in C19+ n-alkanes, resins, and asphaltenes, retained via π-π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals forces. Methodologically, multitemperature pyrolysis (S′2–1+S′2–2) yields movable oil of 0.06–8.82 mg/g (average 2.14 mg/g) but underestimates adsorbed oil by 40–50% (vs NMR), while solvent extraction also shows substantial deviations; T1–T2 NMR (0.013–0.022 mg/L, average 0.0165 mg/L) demonstrates superior sensitivity, primarily due to hydrocarbon volatilization (50–60% loss) during pyrolysis sample preparation. These findings refine sweet spot identification in laminated shale reservoirs, underscoring the need for method-specific calibration and correction factors to reconcile analytical discrepancies for improved movable oil estimation.

Energy & FuelsVol. 40(15)
University of Alberta (CA), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Daqing Oilfield General Hospital (CN), Petroleum Technology Company (Norway) (NO)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.