A systematic review of the voluntary governance landscape for an urgent, high-integrity, and equitable transition to net zero

Abstract This article systematically reviews guidance for non-state entities on transitioning to net zero. The voluntary governance system for corporate climate action consists of a competitive landscape with many documents setting the rules for alignment with ‘net zero’. Our analysis considers the extent to which this landscape supports organizations to transition with integrity, urgency, and equity. Our review assesses the convergence and gaps between documents, and highlights areas of agreement that should urgently be translated into immediate action by organizations, formal standards, and regulations. These include interim targets, quantification and target-setting for Scope 3 emissions, and separate reporting of carbon credits from inventory emissions reductions. Where net-zero guidance is vague, lacking operational detail or contradictory (such as how to reduce Scope 3 emissions, phase out fossil fuels, or embed justice and equity into net-zero strategies) there is risk of weakened organizational action. We present key recommendations to reduce integrity risks and strengthen the net-zero voluntary governance landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae5c21
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of the voluntary governance landscape for an urgent, high-integrity, and equitable transition to net zero

Matilda Becker, Kaya Axelsson, Jessica Thorn, Nadya Kamenkovich et al.
Environmental Research Letters
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

A systematic review of the voluntary governance landscape for an urgent, high-integrity, and equitable transition to net zero

Matilda Becker, Kaya Axelsson, Jessica Thorn, Nadya Kamenkovich, Alexis Marie McGivern, Maud Buytaert, Barry Lee, Max Collett
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article systematically reviews guidance for non-state entities on transitioning to net zero. The voluntary governance system for corporate climate action consists of a competitive landscape with many documents setting the rules for alignment with ‘net zero’. Our analysis considers the extent to which this landscape supports organizations to transition with integrity, urgency, and equity. Our review assesses the convergence and gaps between documents, and highlights areas of agreement that should urgently be translated into immediate action by organizations, formal standards, and regulations. These include interim targets, quantification and target-setting for Scope 3 emissions, and separate reporting of carbon credits from inventory emissions reductions. Where net-zero guidance is vague, lacking operational detail or contradictory (such as how to reduce Scope 3 emissions, phase out fossil fuels, or embed justice and equity into net-zero strategies) there is risk of weakened organizational action. We present key recommendations to reduce integrity risks and strengthen the net-zero voluntary governance landscape.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 21(9)
University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
University of Oxford, European Commission, Economic and Social Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.