A review of catchment rehydration interventions and development of a decision-support framework for managing leaky landscapes

Agricultural landscapes with poor water retention, often referred to as “leaky landscapes”, represent a growing agro-environmental challenge. Although a wide range of landscape rehydration interventions have been proposed, a comprehensive understanding of the global research landscape, key themes, and knowledge gaps within this field remains limited. This review uses a bibliometric analysis and literature synthesis approach to provide quantitative insights into the landscape rehydration research over the past 100 years. This examines bibliometric indicators such as global research trend over time, keywords co-occurrence, citation impact, and collaboration patterns among countries. We found that landscape rehydration was first reported in the mid-1900s and has continued to expand to over 104 countries, focusing on intervention effectiveness, benefits, and limitations. Despite the growing body of literature, the review revealed that most studies evaluate individual interventions in isolation and provide limited guidance on how to select appropriate interventions under varying conditions. This complexity leaves land managers without clear direction for selecting interventions across different landscape contexts. To address this gap, the insights from the literature review were synthesised into a practical decision-support framework that integrates environmental suitability, technical feasibility, economic considerations, and socio-environmental impacts. Further, the framework is demonstrated through a case study application in the Turnip Creek catchment in Victoria, Australia. We identified that pasture improvement, contour ripping, and vegetative cover enhancement are suitable interventions, highlighting the potential support of the framework for future rehydration projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110335
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of catchment rehydration interventions and development of a decision-support framework for managing leaky landscapes

Rebecca E. Lester, Joel Fitzgerald, Aydin Enez, Emily K. Armstrong et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

A review of catchment rehydration interventions and development of a decision-support framework for managing leaky landscapes

Rebecca E. Lester, Joel Fitzgerald, Aydin Enez, Emily K. Armstrong, Udara Piyathilake
article en

Abstract

Agricultural landscapes with poor water retention, often referred to as “leaky landscapes”, represent a growing agro-environmental challenge. Although a wide range of landscape rehydration interventions have been proposed, a comprehensive understanding of the global research landscape, key themes, and knowledge gaps within this field remains limited. This review uses a bibliometric analysis and literature synthesis approach to provide quantitative insights into the landscape rehydration research over the past 100 years. This examines bibliometric indicators such as global research trend over time, keywords co-occurrence, citation impact, and collaboration patterns among countries. We found that landscape rehydration was first reported in the mid-1900s and has continued to expand to over 104 countries, focusing on intervention effectiveness, benefits, and limitations. Despite the growing body of literature, the review revealed that most studies evaluate individual interventions in isolation and provide limited guidance on how to select appropriate interventions under varying conditions. This complexity leaves land managers without clear direction for selecting interventions across different landscape contexts. To address this gap, the insights from the literature review were synthesised into a practical decision-support framework that integrates environmental suitability, technical feasibility, economic considerations, and socio-environmental impacts. Further, the framework is demonstrated through a case study application in the Turnip Creek catchment in Victoria, Australia. We identified that pasture improvement, contour ripping, and vegetative cover enhancement are suitable interventions, highlighting the potential support of the framework for future rehydration projects.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 328
William Buckland Foundation, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.