Assessment of SPT-based Liquefaction Potential using Ensemble Learning and Feature Importance Approaches

Engineers must assess soil susceptibility to liquefaction, yet conventional evaluations are time‑consuming, costly, and affected by field-testing variability and semi‑empirical tools that introduce uncertainty. This study clarifies the importance of key parameters and proposes a streamlined machine‑learning approach using ensemble methods. A comprehensive reference dataset was compiled and used to train reliable machine‑learning models. Feature importance was examined with logistic regression and random forest, after which the data were split into training and test sets, predictors were scaled, and hyperparame0ters were tuned with GridSearchCV. Advanced models were then fitted, followed by ensemble approaches, including AdaBoost and voting classifiers. Based on feature importance results, the most influential features across all methods continue to be the Standard Penetration Test-derived parameters. The trained models were assessed, in which the AdaBoost provided the most accurate estimations by achieving precision, recall, F1_score, Jaccard index, and accuracy of 88%, 88%, 88%, 79%, and 88%, respectively. The Voting Classifier demonstrated superior performance over the AdaBoost Classifier in terms of lower false negative values and higher true positive values, which could be considered as a better predictor for high-risk cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-026-00869-9
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of SPT-based Liquefaction Potential using Ensemble Learning and Feature Importance Approaches

Joel P. Bensing, Masoud ZARE, Gabriele Chiaro, Marlène C. Villeneuve et al.
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Assessment of SPT-based Liquefaction Potential using Ensemble Learning and Feature Importance Approaches

Joel P. Bensing, Masoud ZARE, Gabriele Chiaro, Marlène C. Villeneuve, Arsham Moayedi Far, Arman Moayedi Far
article en

Abstract

Engineers must assess soil susceptibility to liquefaction, yet conventional evaluations are time‑consuming, costly, and affected by field-testing variability and semi‑empirical tools that introduce uncertainty. This study clarifies the importance of key parameters and proposes a streamlined machine‑learning approach using ensemble methods. A comprehensive reference dataset was compiled and used to train reliable machine‑learning models. Feature importance was examined with logistic regression and random forest, after which the data were split into training and test sets, predictors were scaled, and hyperparame0ters were tuned with GridSearchCV. Advanced models were then fitted, followed by ensemble approaches, including AdaBoost and voting classifiers. Based on feature importance results, the most influential features across all methods continue to be the Standard Penetration Test-derived parameters. The trained models were assessed, in which the AdaBoost provided the most accurate estimations by achieving precision, recall, F1_score, Jaccard index, and accuracy of 88%, 88%, 88%, 79%, and 88%, respectively. The Voting Classifier demonstrated superior performance over the AdaBoost Classifier in terms of lower false negative values and higher true positive values, which could be considered as a better predictor for high-risk cases.

Transportation Infrastructure GeotechnologyVol. 13(4)
Montanuniversität Leoben (AT), University of Canterbury (NZ), Materials Center Leoben (Austria) (AT), OFS (United States) (US), Imam Khomeini International University (IR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.