Arthroscopic vs open surgery for shoulder dislocation and instability: A network meta-analysis of treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND: No comprehensive comparative research has been conducted to evaluate open Bankart (OB), arthroscopic Bankart (AB), open Latarjet (OL), and arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) simultaneously across all relevant clinical outcomes and parameters. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of OB, AB, OL, and AL procedures in the treatment of shoulder dislocation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The databases PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were utilized for the literature search. The study evaluated recurrent instability, re-dislocation, apprehension, functional outcomes, and postoperative pain. The results were visually represented through network diagrams, forest plots, league tables, and rank probability plots to provide a comprehensive understanding of each outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 37 studies were included in the analysis. Individuals who underwent OL experienced a notably reduced risk of recurrent instability compared with those who underwent AB (random-effects model pooled relative risk (RR) = 0.34, 95% credible interval (95% CrI): 0.24-0.48) and OB (random-effects model pooled RR = 0.51, 95% CrI: 0.31-0.85). The risk of re-dislocation was also significantly lower for patients treated with OL compared with AB (pooled RR = 0.15, 95% CrI: 0.04-0.45). While not statistically significant, the OL procedure tended to have the lowest risk of apprehension and the highest Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) score. Regarding postoperative pain, patients who underwent OB had the highest likelihood of attaining the lowest scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, OL was associated with the highest probability of complications. CONCLUSION: The open Latarjet procedure appears to offer superior shoulder stability; however, while functional outcomes for patients undergoing OL are likely to be non-inferior, the procedure is not significantly associated with reduced postoperative pain as measured with the VAS score. Additionally, the OL procedure is associated with an increased likelihood of complications. Consequently, it is essential to implement preventive measures to manage postoperative pain and address potential complications following OL procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/208614
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthroscopic vs open surgery for shoulder dislocation and instability: A network meta-analysis of treatment outcomes

Mingming Lei, Qiang Hua, Wenduo Qian, Chenghong Wen et al.
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Arthroscopic vs open surgery for shoulder dislocation and instability: A network meta-analysis of treatment outcomes

Mingming Lei, Qiang Hua, Wenduo Qian, Chenghong Wen, Jide Su
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No comprehensive comparative research has been conducted to evaluate open Bankart (OB), arthroscopic Bankart (AB), open Latarjet (OL), and arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) simultaneously across all relevant clinical outcomes and parameters. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of OB, AB, OL, and AL procedures in the treatment of shoulder dislocation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The databases PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were utilized for the literature search. The study evaluated recurrent instability, re-dislocation, apprehension, functional outcomes, and postoperative pain. The results were visually represented through network diagrams, forest plots, league tables, and rank probability plots to provide a comprehensive understanding of each outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 37 studies were included in the analysis. Individuals who underwent OL experienced a notably reduced risk of recurrent instability compared with those who underwent AB (random-effects model pooled relative risk (RR) = 0.34, 95% credible interval (95% CrI): 0.24-0.48) and OB (random-effects model pooled RR = 0.51, 95% CrI: 0.31-0.85). The risk of re-dislocation was also significantly lower for patients treated with OL compared with AB (pooled RR = 0.15, 95% CrI: 0.04-0.45). While not statistically significant, the OL procedure tended to have the lowest risk of apprehension and the highest Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) score. Regarding postoperative pain, patients who underwent OB had the highest likelihood of attaining the lowest scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, OL was associated with the highest probability of complications. CONCLUSION: The open Latarjet procedure appears to offer superior shoulder stability; however, while functional outcomes for patients undergoing OL are likely to be non-inferior, the procedure is not significantly associated with reduced postoperative pain as measured with the VAS score. Additionally, the OL procedure is associated with an increased likelihood of complications. Consequently, it is essential to implement preventive measures to manage postoperative pain and address potential complications following OL procedure.

Advances in Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 35(5)
Chengdu Sport University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.