Nationwide Trends in Intravascular Ultrasound Use and Outcomes in Elderly Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients Hospitalized withMyocardial Infarction and Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2016-2020

Introduction: Many older adults with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) have multiple comorbidities and often experience worse outcomes after a heart attack (MI). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is sometimes used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to better visualize the coronary arteries and identify blockages. However, it remains unclear how frequently IVUS is used in these patients or whether it improves outcomes for elderly PVD patients undergoing PCI for MI. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2016 to 2020. The study included patients aged 65 or older with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who were hospitalized for a heart attack (MI) and underwent PCI. We identified these patients using ICD-10 codes and divided them into groups based on whether IVUS was used during PCI. We compared their baseline characteristics, tracked changes in IVUS use over time, and reviewed their hospital outcomes. The main outcome measured was death from any cause during the hospital stay. We used statistical methods to account for differences in patient backgrounds, hospital types, and other health conditions. Results: From 2016 to 2020, 117,245 older patients with PVD who experienced a heart attack underwent PCI. IVUS was used in 10,345 cases, representing 8.8%. Most patients were men (62.1%) and White (83.2%). IVUS use increased each year among both men and women and across racial groups. After adjusting for other factors, IVUS use did not result in a significant reduction in in-hospital deaths compared to PCI without IVUS. However, among those who had IVUS-guided PCI, men had lower in-hospital death rates than women. Discussion: Although IVUS use increased over time, it was not associated with better short-term survival in these older PVD patients. The differences between men and women may be related to heart anatomy, blood vessel size, disease severity, or other factors not fully captured in the data. Conclusion: IVUS is now used more frequently during PCI in older PVD patients with heart attacks. However, we did not find a clear benefit in reducing in-hospital deaths. The differences in outcomes between men and women suggest that IVUS may not have the same effect for all patients. More longterm studies are needed to determine which patients benefit most from IVUS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Cardiology Reviews
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403x424394260102064616
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationwide Trends in Intravascular Ultrasound Use and Outcomes in Elderly Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients Hospitalized withMyocardial Infarction and Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2016-2020

Ankit Vyas, Sunny Goel, Tanisha Mishra, Sidhartha Gautam Senapati et al.
Current Cardiology Reviews
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Nationwide Trends in Intravascular Ultrasound Use and Outcomes in Elderly Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients Hospitalized withMyocardial Infarction and Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2016-2020

Ankit Vyas, Sunny Goel, Tanisha Mishra, Sidhartha Gautam Senapati, Vamsikalyan Borra, Rutvij Patel, Rishwa Patel, Rupak Desai, Anupama Gupta, Pooja Suchday, Dayana Shree Narayna Swamy, Rashma Anne, Urvashi Rathod, Sravya Pinnamaneni
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Many older adults with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) have multiple comorbidities and often experience worse outcomes after a heart attack (MI). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is sometimes used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to better visualize the coronary arteries and identify blockages. However, it remains unclear how frequently IVUS is used in these patients or whether it improves outcomes for elderly PVD patients undergoing PCI for MI. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2016 to 2020. The study included patients aged 65 or older with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who were hospitalized for a heart attack (MI) and underwent PCI. We identified these patients using ICD-10 codes and divided them into groups based on whether IVUS was used during PCI. We compared their baseline characteristics, tracked changes in IVUS use over time, and reviewed their hospital outcomes. The main outcome measured was death from any cause during the hospital stay. We used statistical methods to account for differences in patient backgrounds, hospital types, and other health conditions. Results: From 2016 to 2020, 117,245 older patients with PVD who experienced a heart attack underwent PCI. IVUS was used in 10,345 cases, representing 8.8%. Most patients were men (62.1%) and White (83.2%). IVUS use increased each year among both men and women and across racial groups. After adjusting for other factors, IVUS use did not result in a significant reduction in in-hospital deaths compared to PCI without IVUS. However, among those who had IVUS-guided PCI, men had lower in-hospital death rates than women. Discussion: Although IVUS use increased over time, it was not associated with better short-term survival in these older PVD patients. The differences between men and women may be related to heart anatomy, blood vessel size, disease severity, or other factors not fully captured in the data. Conclusion: IVUS is now used more frequently during PCI in older PVD patients with heart attacks. However, we did not find a clear benefit in reducing in-hospital deaths. The differences in outcomes between men and women suggest that IVUS may not have the same effect for all patients. More longterm studies are needed to determine which patients benefit most from IVUS.

Current Cardiology ReviewsVol. 22
Creighton University (US), Siddhartha Medical College (IN), Texas Tech University (US), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Ochsner Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Mysore Medical College (IN), D.Y. Patil University (IN), Oldham Council (GB), Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College (IN), B.J. Medical College (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.