The association between remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive efforts to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular disease remains highly prevalent. Remnant cholesterol (RC) has been proposed as a potentially more relevant therapeutic target. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between RC reduction and cardiovascular outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering therapies, assessing whether RC independently influences cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Cochrane Central and Embase were searched for RCTs with ≥1000 participants and ≥2 years' planned duration that assessed cholesterol- or triglyceride-lowering therapies vs placebo, usual care, or other lipid-lowering drugs in adults. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Forty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria; most had some risk of bias, and evidence certainty was moderate. Meta-analysis showed absolute risk reductions of 0.4% (95% CI 0.1%-0.6%) for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI 1.1%-1.6%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI 0.2%-0.6%) for stroke in treatment vs control groups. Meta-regression demonstrated no association between RC reduction and any clinical outcome, whereas LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions were associated with risk reduction. CONCLUSION: RC reduction was not associated with cardiovascular benefit. This contrasts with observational and Mendelian randomization studies, likely reflecting methodological differences; MR estimates lifelong genetically mediated exposure and may not reliably predict the effects of short-term pharmacological lipid lowering. LAY SUMMARY: In a review of 43 large clinical trials, lowering "remnant cholesterol" did not reduce heart attacks, strokes, or deaths - unlike lowering LDL ("bad") cholesterol, which did - suggesting that remnant cholesterol may not be a useful treatment target despite earlier studies hinting otherwise.Summary sentence A review of 43 clinical trials found that lowering remnant cholesterol did not translate into fewer deaths, heart attacks, or strokes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of clinical lipidology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2026.03.026
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-regression

Maryanne Demasi, Robert DuBroff, KM Saif-Ur-Rahman, Trevor Lin et al.
Journal of clinical lipidology
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

The association between remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-regression

Maryanne Demasi, Robert DuBroff, KM Saif-Ur-Rahman, Trevor Lin, Paula Byrne, Mark Jones
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive efforts to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular disease remains highly prevalent. Remnant cholesterol (RC) has been proposed as a potentially more relevant therapeutic target. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between RC reduction and cardiovascular outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering therapies, assessing whether RC independently influences cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Cochrane Central and Embase were searched for RCTs with ≥1000 participants and ≥2 years' planned duration that assessed cholesterol- or triglyceride-lowering therapies vs placebo, usual care, or other lipid-lowering drugs in adults. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Forty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria; most had some risk of bias, and evidence certainty was moderate. Meta-analysis showed absolute risk reductions of 0.4% (95% CI 0.1%-0.6%) for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI 1.1%-1.6%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI 0.2%-0.6%) for stroke in treatment vs control groups. Meta-regression demonstrated no association between RC reduction and any clinical outcome, whereas LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions were associated with risk reduction. CONCLUSION: RC reduction was not associated with cardiovascular benefit. This contrasts with observational and Mendelian randomization studies, likely reflecting methodological differences; MR estimates lifelong genetically mediated exposure and may not reliably predict the effects of short-term pharmacological lipid lowering. LAY SUMMARY: In a review of 43 large clinical trials, lowering "remnant cholesterol" did not reduce heart attacks, strokes, or deaths - unlike lowering LDL ("bad") cholesterol, which did - suggesting that remnant cholesterol may not be a useful treatment target despite earlier studies hinting otherwise.Summary sentence A review of 43 clinical trials found that lowering remnant cholesterol did not translate into fewer deaths, heart attacks, or strokes.

Journal of clinical lipidology
Bond University (AU), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), University of South Florida (US), Blackstone (United States) (US), California Teaching Fellows Foundation (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.