The Risk from Reopening International Travel During a Disease X Pandemic: A Case Study of SARS‐CoV‐2

During the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, many mathematical models and risk assessments have been created to inform policymakers on effective strategies for controlling the spread of the pathogen. These models were often developed rapidly for timely input to strategic decisions. It is prudent to evaluate the models created and learn from experience so that we can be adequately prepared for a future pandemic. One area of modeling developed during the COVID-19 pandemic was for international travel and how to safely reopen borders and to which countries. We developed an importation risk model for estimating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infectious travelers entering any airport and parameterized it for UK airports. We ran the model using prevalence estimates from August 2020 and found that 895 (CI: 834-958) infectious travelers would arrive in a single week from the 25 countries considered. We simulated health measures on arrival to assess the efficacy of self-isolation, the policy at the time, in comparison to proposed alternatives. We found that the 14-day self-isolation is 78.0% effective (CI: 74.4-81.6), whereas a test at the airport plus an additional test 4 days later is 68.9% (CI: 64.9-73.0) effective, after accounting for 20% noncompliance. Rapidly implementing control measures for travelers from riskier countries is vital to protect public health. This methodology can be quickly updated to assess the impact of any further changes to international travel policy or disease occurrence. We assess whether our model results would be applicable for a future Disease X, the adaptability of our model, future work to ensure that the model is comprehensive, and the lessons learned from modeling during COVID-19. In particular, we highlight the importance of building flexible, transparent, and adaptable models due to the speed at which policy or the epidemiological situation can change and for use in any future pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70240
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Risk from Reopening International Travel During a Disease X Pandemic: A Case Study of SARS‐CoV‐2

Kai T F Man, Louise Kelly, Virag Patel, Rachel A. Taylor et al.
Risk Analysis
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

The Risk from Reopening International Travel During a Disease X Pandemic: A Case Study of SARS‐CoV‐2

Kai T F Man, Louise Kelly, Virag Patel, Rachel A. Taylor, Ruth Moir, Emma Snary, Catherine McCarthy
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, many mathematical models and risk assessments have been created to inform policymakers on effective strategies for controlling the spread of the pathogen. These models were often developed rapidly for timely input to strategic decisions. It is prudent to evaluate the models created and learn from experience so that we can be adequately prepared for a future pandemic. One area of modeling developed during the COVID-19 pandemic was for international travel and how to safely reopen borders and to which countries. We developed an importation risk model for estimating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infectious travelers entering any airport and parameterized it for UK airports. We ran the model using prevalence estimates from August 2020 and found that 895 (CI: 834-958) infectious travelers would arrive in a single week from the 25 countries considered. We simulated health measures on arrival to assess the efficacy of self-isolation, the policy at the time, in comparison to proposed alternatives. We found that the 14-day self-isolation is 78.0% effective (CI: 74.4-81.6), whereas a test at the airport plus an additional test 4 days later is 68.9% (CI: 64.9-73.0) effective, after accounting for 20% noncompliance. Rapidly implementing control measures for travelers from riskier countries is vital to protect public health. This methodology can be quickly updated to assess the impact of any further changes to international travel policy or disease occurrence. We assess whether our model results would be applicable for a future Disease X, the adaptability of our model, future work to ensure that the model is comprehensive, and the lessons learned from modeling during COVID-19. In particular, we highlight the importance of building flexible, transparent, and adaptable models due to the speed at which policy or the epidemiological situation can change and for use in any future pandemic.

Risk AnalysisVol. 46(4)
Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB)
Public Health England, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.