Decoding Multimodal Text Analytics: Tasks, Datasets, Fusion Models, and Future Frontiers

ABSTRACT It is estimated that the volume of data on the digital fronts will grow exponentially to reach a volume of 180 zettabytes by 2025, and more than 90% of this data will be of unstructured forms. The unimodal to multimodal text analytics (MTA) has been triggered by this phenomenon. The early introduction of the multimodal text were observed in scholarly literature and industrial use‐cases during the early 2010s. Since then, it has greatly expanded its horizons in other sectors such as healthcare, e‐commerce, education and public safety. This survey presents a task‐oriented, modality‐inclusive, and dataset‐aware synthesis of recent advancements in MTA, which offers an in‐depth review of 10 core text analytics tasks through a multimodal lens. We systematically analyze over 160 research studies and categorize more than 120 state‐of‐the‐art models, spanning fusion strategies, representation learning, transformer architectures, and pretrained vision‐language frameworks (e.g., CLIP, ViLBERT). In a variety of datasets including CMU‐MOSI, CMU‐MOSEI, IEMOCAP, and MAViT‐Bangla, multimodal models achieve up to 18%–25% F 1‐score improvements over text‐only baselines, captured in the standardized task‐wise comparison tables that are part of this survey. Moreover, this survey discusses seven under‐explored tasks, including personality detection, satire detection, and author profiling, and elaborates gaps in research in modality fusion, diversity of data sets, and social inclusivity in these tasks. It does not only fill gaps in the current literature by unifying knowledge in different fields, but also offers researchers working on MTA a future path. It is the first survey that puts all the key tasks within multimodal text analytics into a contiguous and consistent overview compared to other surveys that either refer to multimodal computing at an administrative level or concentrate on a specific task. This article is categorized under: Algorithmic Development > Text Mining Algorithmic Development > Web Mining Application Areas > Society and Culture

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70083
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Multimodal Text Analytics: Tasks, Datasets, Fusion Models, and Future Frontiers

Manjari Gupta, Vedika Gupta, Tanusree Nath
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Decoding Multimodal Text Analytics: Tasks, Datasets, Fusion Models, and Future Frontiers

Manjari Gupta, Vedika Gupta, Tanusree Nath
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is estimated that the volume of data on the digital fronts will grow exponentially to reach a volume of 180 zettabytes by 2025, and more than 90% of this data will be of unstructured forms. The unimodal to multimodal text analytics (MTA) has been triggered by this phenomenon. The early introduction of the multimodal text were observed in scholarly literature and industrial use‐cases during the early 2010s. Since then, it has greatly expanded its horizons in other sectors such as healthcare, e‐commerce, education and public safety. This survey presents a task‐oriented, modality‐inclusive, and dataset‐aware synthesis of recent advancements in MTA, which offers an in‐depth review of 10 core text analytics tasks through a multimodal lens. We systematically analyze over 160 research studies and categorize more than 120 state‐of‐the‐art models, spanning fusion strategies, representation learning, transformer architectures, and pretrained vision‐language frameworks (e.g., CLIP, ViLBERT). In a variety of datasets including CMU‐MOSI, CMU‐MOSEI, IEMOCAP, and MAViT‐Bangla, multimodal models achieve up to 18%–25% F 1‐score improvements over text‐only baselines, captured in the standardized task‐wise comparison tables that are part of this survey. Moreover, this survey discusses seven under‐explored tasks, including personality detection, satire detection, and author profiling, and elaborates gaps in research in modality fusion, diversity of data sets, and social inclusivity in these tasks. It does not only fill gaps in the current literature by unifying knowledge in different fields, but also offers researchers working on MTA a future path. It is the first survey that puts all the key tasks within multimodal text analytics into a contiguous and consistent overview compared to other surveys that either refer to multimodal computing at an administrative level or concentrate on a specific task. This article is categorized under: Algorithmic Development > Text Mining Algorithmic Development > Web Mining Application Areas > Society and Culture

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoveryVol. 16(2)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), University of Tartu (EE), Punjabi University (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.