A multi-modal strategy for enhancing titanium–bone interface strength and antimicrobial properties of PMMA bone cements

Infection prevention and retention at the bone-device interface are critical for long-term stability of titanium-based biomedical implants. This study utilized a multifactorial approach to assess bond strength and antibacterial activity of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements modified with polymerizable antimicrobials (quaternary ammonium methacrylate, QAM) for sustained antibiofilm effects. Four commercial dental adhesives (Gen 4, Gen 5, Gen 6, Gen 7) were tested between porcine cortical bone and PMMA bone cements (Jet Acrylic or Biomet Bone Cement R). Shear bond strength (SBS), interface analysis (SEM, FTIR/ATR) and cytotoxicity (MTT) were evaluated and compared to controls without dental adhesive, which is the current standard of care. Top performing materials were subjected to stringent mechanical cycling in a bioreactor, followed by SBS assessment. Finally, bone cements were modified with QAMs and evaluated with or without dental adhesive for physical properties, antibiotic activity and SBS. Refobacin was used as an antibiotic-containing commercial control. Results showed more than a twenty-fold increase in SBS after 24 h and up to a fifteen-fold improvement after mechanical cycling with the Gen 6 adhesive, compared to commercial control cements. Refobacin and the QAM-modified cement significantly reduced S. aureus biofilm biomass, but the QAM cements were significantly better able to maintain antimicrobial activity after water storage. Even though the shear bond strength was reduced with either QAM or Refobacin, the presence of the adhesive mitigated this reduction in comparison with the Refobacin applied without the adhesive. Overall, the results suggest that the application of dental adhesives prior to cementation provides an avenue for improving implant retention and that incorporating QAMs may offer a means of sustained infection control.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Materials & Design
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115970
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-modal strategy for enhancing titanium–bone interface strength and antimicrobial properties of PMMA bone cements

Fernanda Sandes de Lucena, Matthew G. Logan, Henrico Badaoui Strazzi‐Sahyon, Karina H. Nakayama et al.
Materials & Design
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

A multi-modal strategy for enhancing titanium–bone interface strength and antimicrobial properties of PMMA bone cements

Fernanda Sandes de Lucena, Matthew G. Logan, Henrico Badaoui Strazzi‐Sahyon, Karina H. Nakayama, Sivashankari Rajasekaran, Carmem Silvia Costa Pfeifer, Samuel Weber, Ana Paula P. Fugolin, Fernanda M. Tsuzuki, Steven H. Lewis
article en

Abstract

Infection prevention and retention at the bone-device interface are critical for long-term stability of titanium-based biomedical implants. This study utilized a multifactorial approach to assess bond strength and antibacterial activity of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements modified with polymerizable antimicrobials (quaternary ammonium methacrylate, QAM) for sustained antibiofilm effects. Four commercial dental adhesives (Gen 4, Gen 5, Gen 6, Gen 7) were tested between porcine cortical bone and PMMA bone cements (Jet Acrylic or Biomet Bone Cement R). Shear bond strength (SBS), interface analysis (SEM, FTIR/ATR) and cytotoxicity (MTT) were evaluated and compared to controls without dental adhesive, which is the current standard of care. Top performing materials were subjected to stringent mechanical cycling in a bioreactor, followed by SBS assessment. Finally, bone cements were modified with QAMs and evaluated with or without dental adhesive for physical properties, antibiotic activity and SBS. Refobacin was used as an antibiotic-containing commercial control. Results showed more than a twenty-fold increase in SBS after 24 h and up to a fifteen-fold improvement after mechanical cycling with the Gen 6 adhesive, compared to commercial control cements. Refobacin and the QAM-modified cement significantly reduced S. aureus biofilm biomass, but the QAM cements were significantly better able to maintain antimicrobial activity after water storage. Even though the shear bond strength was reduced with either QAM or Refobacin, the presence of the adhesive mitigated this reduction in comparison with the Refobacin applied without the adhesive. Overall, the results suggest that the application of dental adhesives prior to cementation provides an avenue for improving implant retention and that incorporating QAMs may offer a means of sustained infection control.

Materials & DesignVol. 265
Silver Family Foundation, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.