The effect of interpersonal distance and background context on trait impressions

People rapidly form trait impressions of other individuals that they encounter based on their visual appearance. Such opinions are made with consensus between observers, yet external factors can also influence judgments. Here, we investigated the effects of two potentially important external factors - interpersonal distance and background context - by manipulating these variables while participants evaluated life-sized whole-person stimuli. Participants rated attractiveness, competence, dominance, and trustworthiness of target figures presented to them at near and far distances with different positively or negatively valenced backgrounds that were ambient (Experiment 1: beach vs. fire scenes) or social (Experiment 2: happy vs. disgusted flanking figures). We predicted that targets would be rated more favourably in positive vs negative background contexts, and that this effect may interact with interpersonal distance (at far distances people may rely relatively more on background cues). This is the first investigation of how these two factors jointly shape a broad set of trait impressions under naturalistic (life-sized, whole-body) viewing conditions. Results broadly confirmed a strong influence of background context tested. However, the predicted interaction with interpersonal distance was observed selectively for trustworthiness judgments in a social background context (Experiment 2). Together our findings provide first evidence of an influence of context on different trait judgments, and suggest the trait-selective differences in the integration of such cues with distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106770
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of interpersonal distance and background context on trait impressions

Ian D. Stephen, Andrew P. Bayliss, Mintao Zhao, Louise Ewing et al.
Acta Psychologica
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

The effect of interpersonal distance and background context on trait impressions

Ian D. Stephen, Andrew P. Bayliss, Mintao Zhao, Louise Ewing, Kristina Veranič
article en

Abstract

People rapidly form trait impressions of other individuals that they encounter based on their visual appearance. Such opinions are made with consensus between observers, yet external factors can also influence judgments. Here, we investigated the effects of two potentially important external factors - interpersonal distance and background context - by manipulating these variables while participants evaluated life-sized whole-person stimuli. Participants rated attractiveness, competence, dominance, and trustworthiness of target figures presented to them at near and far distances with different positively or negatively valenced backgrounds that were ambient (Experiment 1: beach vs. fire scenes) or social (Experiment 2: happy vs. disgusted flanking figures). We predicted that targets would be rated more favourably in positive vs negative background contexts, and that this effect may interact with interpersonal distance (at far distances people may rely relatively more on background cues). This is the first investigation of how these two factors jointly shape a broad set of trait impressions under naturalistic (life-sized, whole-body) viewing conditions. Results broadly confirmed a strong influence of background context tested. However, the predicted interaction with interpersonal distance was observed selectively for trustworthiness judgments in a social background context (Experiment 2). Together our findings provide first evidence of an influence of context on different trait judgments, and suggest the trait-selective differences in the integration of such cues with distance.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 266
University of East Anglia (GB), Bournemouth University (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effect of interpersonal distance and background context on trait impressions — Ian D. Stephen, Andrew P. Bayliss, et al. · Acta Psychologica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS