A review of the differential impacts of China’s mandatory waste sorting policies on urban–rural household waste sorting

Since 2019, some Chinese cities have introduced mandatory household waste sorting policies to reshape residents’ waste sorting intention and behaviour. However, evidence of their effectiveness remains inconsistent, particularly between urban and rural areas. Hence, it is crucial to understand the effectiveness of these policies, particularly from an urban–rural comparative perspective to enhance the precision of policy implementation. This study employs a narrative review approach to examine 43 articles on household waste sorting intention and behaviour in China, sourced from the Web of Science (WoS) database. We find that urban-focused research substantially outweighs rural studies. In addition, the reviewed literature is largely concentrated in Shanghai, Beijing, and Jiangsu. We further find that infrastructural instruments demonstrate consistently positive effects on both waste sorting intention and behaviour in urban and rural areas. Composite instruments also show stable positive effects on waste sorting behaviour. Informational instruments produce uniformly positive effects on waste sorting intention across urban and rural areas, but their behavioural effects are less consistent in urban areas. Moreover, reward and punishment instruments show less consistent effects on both waste sorting intention and behaviour in urban areas, while in rural areas their intention effects are more stable but behavioural outcomes remain mixed. The results suggest that governments should prioritise infrastructural development in both urban and rural areas, given its consistently positive effects. Reward and punishment mechanisms require further examination and policy adjustment in both urban and rural areas. Informational strategies in urban areas should be refined to enhance waste sorting behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainability
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1734719
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of the differential impacts of China’s mandatory waste sorting policies on urban–rural household waste sorting

Mou Leong Tan, Soo Khoon Goh, Xiaomei Shao
Frontiers in Sustainability
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

A review of the differential impacts of China’s mandatory waste sorting policies on urban–rural household waste sorting

Mou Leong Tan, Soo Khoon Goh, Xiaomei Shao
article en

Abstract

Since 2019, some Chinese cities have introduced mandatory household waste sorting policies to reshape residents’ waste sorting intention and behaviour. However, evidence of their effectiveness remains inconsistent, particularly between urban and rural areas. Hence, it is crucial to understand the effectiveness of these policies, particularly from an urban–rural comparative perspective to enhance the precision of policy implementation. This study employs a narrative review approach to examine 43 articles on household waste sorting intention and behaviour in China, sourced from the Web of Science (WoS) database. We find that urban-focused research substantially outweighs rural studies. In addition, the reviewed literature is largely concentrated in Shanghai, Beijing, and Jiangsu. We further find that infrastructural instruments demonstrate consistently positive effects on both waste sorting intention and behaviour in urban and rural areas. Composite instruments also show stable positive effects on waste sorting behaviour. Informational instruments produce uniformly positive effects on waste sorting intention across urban and rural areas, but their behavioural effects are less consistent in urban areas. Moreover, reward and punishment instruments show less consistent effects on both waste sorting intention and behaviour in urban areas, while in rural areas their intention effects are more stable but behavioural outcomes remain mixed. The results suggest that governments should prioritise infrastructural development in both urban and rural areas, given its consistently positive effects. Reward and punishment mechanisms require further examination and policy adjustment in both urban and rural areas. Informational strategies in urban areas should be refined to enhance waste sorting behaviour.

Frontiers in SustainabilityVol. 7
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Guangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.