Surgical approach, relapse risk and overall survival in borderline ovarian tumors: age-stratified analysis based on real-world data

Background: The need for complete staging surgery including hysterectomy for all age patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is debatable, considering fertility in younger patients and potential higher morbidity in older patients. We aimed to investigate the relapse risk and overall survival in a cohort including patients who underwent conservative surgery (organ-preserving procedures) to minimize complications, independent of fertility considerations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based review of 217 surgically treated BOT patients in Southern Sweden (2017-2022). Patients were stratified by age (≤40, 41-50, 51-65, >65 years) and surgical approach (conservative vs complete staging). Outcomes included recurrence, 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at end-of-follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests evaluated survival differences; univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors. Results: Of 217 patients, 9 had a synchronous malignancy and were excluded from the survival analyses. 36 underwent conservative surgery, 167 complete staging surgery and 5 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with uterus preservation. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative surgery (12.1%) than complete surgery (3.2%) but did not reach statistical significance. Five-year OS was 100% for patients ≤40 and 41-50 years, 95.3% for those 51-65 years and 92.5% for >65 years (log-rank p=0.02). PFS differed by age in the overall cohort (p=0.002) and among complete surgery patients (p=0.001), but not in conservative surgery patients (p=0.721). OS did not differ significantly among complete surgery patients across age categories (p=0.287). In multivariate Cox regression, age at first operation was the only independent predictor of survival (HR = 1.068, 95% CI 1.018-1.119, p=0.007). Conclusion: Age at first operation independently predicts survival in BOT. Young age at first surgery was associated with a higher risk of relapse, regardless the type of surgery, whereas older age was associated with an increased risk of death. Conservative surgery does not compromise long-term outcomes and can be considered across age categories to balance oncologic safety with the goal of reducing surgical morbidity, supporting individualized treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1810193
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical approach, relapse risk and overall survival in borderline ovarian tumors: age-stratified analysis based on real-world data

Sara Alson, Karina Liuba, Mihaela Asp, Natalia Maciuszko
Frontiers in Oncology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Surgical approach, relapse risk and overall survival in borderline ovarian tumors: age-stratified analysis based on real-world data

Sara Alson, Karina Liuba, Mihaela Asp, Natalia Maciuszko
article en

Abstract

Background: The need for complete staging surgery including hysterectomy for all age patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is debatable, considering fertility in younger patients and potential higher morbidity in older patients. We aimed to investigate the relapse risk and overall survival in a cohort including patients who underwent conservative surgery (organ-preserving procedures) to minimize complications, independent of fertility considerations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based review of 217 surgically treated BOT patients in Southern Sweden (2017-2022). Patients were stratified by age (≤40, 41-50, 51-65, >65 years) and surgical approach (conservative vs complete staging). Outcomes included recurrence, 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at end-of-follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests evaluated survival differences; univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors. Results: Of 217 patients, 9 had a synchronous malignancy and were excluded from the survival analyses. 36 underwent conservative surgery, 167 complete staging surgery and 5 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with uterus preservation. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative surgery (12.1%) than complete surgery (3.2%) but did not reach statistical significance. Five-year OS was 100% for patients ≤40 and 41-50 years, 95.3% for those 51-65 years and 92.5% for >65 years (log-rank p=0.02). PFS differed by age in the overall cohort (p=0.002) and among complete surgery patients (p=0.001), but not in conservative surgery patients (p=0.721). OS did not differ significantly among complete surgery patients across age categories (p=0.287). In multivariate Cox regression, age at first operation was the only independent predictor of survival (HR = 1.068, 95% CI 1.018-1.119, p=0.007). Conclusion: Age at first operation independently predicts survival in BOT. Young age at first surgery was associated with a higher risk of relapse, regardless the type of surgery, whereas older age was associated with an increased risk of death. Conservative surgery does not compromise long-term outcomes and can be considered across age categories to balance oncologic safety with the goal of reducing surgical morbidity, supporting individualized treatment planning.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Lasarettet i Ystad (SE)
Skåne County Council's Research and Development Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.