Evaluation and volumetric analysis of various grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair

This study compared autologous mandibular symphyseal bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitutes for unilateral alveolar cleft repair. A retrospective cohort of 112 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate was analysed. Four groups were studied: autologous mandibular symphyseal bone graft (n = 37), pure phase β-tricalcium phosphate (n = 33), biphasic calcium phosphate (n = 18) and a hybrid construct of both calcium phosphate scaffolds (n = 24). Cone-beam computed tomography, preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, was assessed using a segmentation protocol. Primary objectives included residual calcified tissue volume, spontaneous eruption of adjacent teeth, alveolar process continuity, and presence of oronasal fistula. Median residual calcified tissue volumes were: mandibular symphyseal bone 52.1%, pure β-TCP 35.6%, biphasic calcium phosphate 87.8% and hybrid construct 76.0%. Overall group comparison revealed a statistically significant effect (P < 0.001). Biphasic calcium phosphate and hybrid constructs showed significantly higher residual calcified tissue volumes compared to mandibular symphyseal bone (P = 0.003, P = 0.024). However, no significant differences were found in spontaneous tooth eruption, alveolar continuity, or oronasal fistula presence. Biphasic calcium substitutes and hybrid calcium phosphate constructs showed significantly higher residual calcified tissue volumes and comparable clinical outcomes compared to autologous bone grafts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2026.03.027
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and volumetric analysis of various grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair

A.J.W.P. Rosenberg, J.E. Bergsma, F. Bielevelt, C.C. Stoop et al.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Evaluation and volumetric analysis of various grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair

A.J.W.P. Rosenberg, J.E. Bergsma, F. Bielevelt, C.C. Stoop, N.G. Janssen
article en

Abstract

This study compared autologous mandibular symphyseal bone grafts and biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitutes for unilateral alveolar cleft repair. A retrospective cohort of 112 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate was analysed. Four groups were studied: autologous mandibular symphyseal bone graft (n = 37), pure phase β-tricalcium phosphate (n = 33), biphasic calcium phosphate (n = 18) and a hybrid construct of both calcium phosphate scaffolds (n = 24). Cone-beam computed tomography, preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, was assessed using a segmentation protocol. Primary objectives included residual calcified tissue volume, spontaneous eruption of adjacent teeth, alveolar process continuity, and presence of oronasal fistula. Median residual calcified tissue volumes were: mandibular symphyseal bone 52.1%, pure β-TCP 35.6%, biphasic calcium phosphate 87.8% and hybrid construct 76.0%. Overall group comparison revealed a statistically significant effect (P < 0.001). Biphasic calcium phosphate and hybrid constructs showed significantly higher residual calcified tissue volumes compared to mandibular symphyseal bone (P = 0.003, P = 0.024). However, no significant differences were found in spontaneous tooth eruption, alveolar continuity, or oronasal fistula presence. Biphasic calcium substitutes and hybrid calcium phosphate constructs showed significantly higher residual calcified tissue volumes and comparable clinical outcomes compared to autologous bone grafts.

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.