Cassirer and the Arithmetization of Physics

Abstract Drawing an explicit parallel with Felix Klein’s account of the arithmetization of 19th-century mathematics, Cassirer maintains that 19th-century physics likewise underwent a process of arithmetization that culminated in the 20th century. This paper argues that this constitutes an original insight and a unifying thread running through Cassirer’s philosophy of physics over several decades, one that has yet to receive adequate scholarly attention. In contrast to his fellow Marburg neo-Kantians, Cohen and Natorp, who regarded the continuum as central to modern scientific knowledge, Cassirer treated number-formation as the prototype of scientific concept-formation in general. The number-sequence combines the structuralist view that each individual number has no intrinsic identity apart from its reciprocal ‘relation’ to all other numbers with the constructivist view that such a relation is a ‘productive relation’, generating ordered sequences of all possible numbers. The paper concludes that, for this reason, Cassirer may be said to have defended a form of ‘structural constructivism’ rather than ‘structural realism’, as is often claimed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Science
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.a.582
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cassirer and the Arithmetization of Physics

Marco Giovanelli
Perspectives on Science
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Cassirer and the Arithmetization of Physics

Marco Giovanelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drawing an explicit parallel with Felix Klein’s account of the arithmetization of 19th-century mathematics, Cassirer maintains that 19th-century physics likewise underwent a process of arithmetization that culminated in the 20th century. This paper argues that this constitutes an original insight and a unifying thread running through Cassirer’s philosophy of physics over several decades, one that has yet to receive adequate scholarly attention. In contrast to his fellow Marburg neo-Kantians, Cohen and Natorp, who regarded the continuum as central to modern scientific knowledge, Cassirer treated number-formation as the prototype of scientific concept-formation in general. The number-sequence combines the structuralist view that each individual number has no intrinsic identity apart from its reciprocal ‘relation’ to all other numbers with the constructivist view that such a relation is a ‘productive relation’, generating ordered sequences of all possible numbers. The paper concludes that, for this reason, Cassirer may be said to have defended a form of ‘structural constructivism’ rather than ‘structural realism’, as is often claimed.

Perspectives on Science
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.