From criticism to pragmatism? The impact of NGEU funding on party-based Euroscepticism in Italy – CORRIGENDUM

On page 1, the article features an interview with Marine Le Pen published by El Pas, stating that Italy has received 240 billion euros in EU funds.Although the quote from Le Pen's interview is accurate, the authors wish to clarify that the correct figure is 194 billion.On page 10, line 26, "Conversely, the probability of making critical or alternative statements EU is negatively associated with the likelihood of making critical or alternative political statements, though the strength and certainty of this relationship vary across models." should be replaced with "Conversely, an increase in public support toward the EU is negatively associated with the likelihood of making critical or alternative political statements, though the strength and certainty of this relationship vary across models."The authors apologize for any confusion this may cause

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2026.10091
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From criticism to pragmatism? The impact of NGEU funding on party-based Euroscepticism in Italy – CORRIGENDUM

Igor Guardiancich, L. Quaglia, Enrico Borghetto, Luca Cabras
Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
European Union Policy and Governance
article

From criticism to pragmatism? The impact of NGEU funding on party-based Euroscepticism in Italy – CORRIGENDUM

Igor Guardiancich, L. Quaglia, Enrico Borghetto, Luca Cabras
article en

Abstract

On page 1, the article features an interview with Marine Le Pen published by El Pas, stating that Italy has received 240 billion euros in EU funds.Although the quote from Le Pen's interview is accurate, the authors wish to clarify that the correct figure is 194 billion.On page 10, line 26, "Conversely, the probability of making critical or alternative statements EU is negatively associated with the likelihood of making critical or alternative political statements, though the strength and certainty of this relationship vary across models." should be replaced with "Conversely, an increase in public support toward the EU is negatively associated with the likelihood of making critical or alternative political statements, though the strength and certainty of this relationship vary across models."The authors apologize for any confusion this may cause

Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.