Public knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cancer screening in the UAE: a comprehensive assessment to inform screening practices

Background and objectives: Despite the proven benefits of early cancer detection in reducing disease-related complications and deaths, participation in cancer screening programs varies across population and is influenced by multiple individual and systemic-level factors. Understanding knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding cancer screening is essential to inform effective public health strategies, Therefore, this study aimed to assess these factors among adults in the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a bilingual (English/Arabic), self-administered online questionnaire distributed via social media. The survey collected data on socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle-related risk factors, and cancer screening practices. Cancer knowledge was assessed using 59 items covering general knowledge, screenable cancers, warning signs and symptoms, and environmental risk factors. Attitudes perceived facilitators and barriers to screening were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Screening behavior was assessed as self-reported lifetime ("ever") participation in any cancer screening test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with screening practices. Results: A total of 811 individuals completed the study questionnaire, of whom only 36.5% reported having ever undergone any cancer screening test. Higher knowledge (OR = 1.022; 95% CI: 1.007-1.037) and more positive attitudes (OR = 1.091; 95% CI: 1.062-1.120) were associated with increased screening uptake. Older age (OR = 0.970; 95% CI: 0.955-0.985) and lower income (OR = 0.689; 95% CI: 0.483-0.982) were associated with a reduced likelihood of screening. Physician recommendation (47.0%) and early detection (45.3%) were the main motivators, while fear of results (39.5%), lack of symptoms (38.6%), and unfamiliarity with screening sites (38.5%) were the most common barriers. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate moderate cancer knowledge, variable screening attitudes, and multiple behavioral and system-level barriers. Knowledge, attitudes, age, and income, were significantly associated with lifetime screening participation, while physician recommendation and early detection emerged as key motivators. Targeted educational interventions and improved healthcare system navigation may enhance screening uptake in similar populations. However, findings should be interpreted with caution due to cross-sectional design, convenience sampling, reliance on self-reported lifetime screening, and the relatively young age distribution, which may limit causal inference and generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1808218
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cancer screening in the UAE: a comprehensive assessment to inform screening practices

Anan S. Jarab, Yazid N. Al Hamarneh, Ahmad Z. Al Meslamani, Maher R. Khdour et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Public knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cancer screening in the UAE: a comprehensive assessment to inform screening practices

Anan S. Jarab, Yazid N. Al Hamarneh, Ahmad Z. Al Meslamani, Maher R. Khdour, Zelal Jaber Kharaba, Salahdein Aburuz, Omar Jrab, Hamza Jarab, Rahma Elsherif, Nada A. Alsaleh, Walid Al-Qerem
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite the proven benefits of early cancer detection in reducing disease-related complications and deaths, participation in cancer screening programs varies across population and is influenced by multiple individual and systemic-level factors. Understanding knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding cancer screening is essential to inform effective public health strategies, Therefore, this study aimed to assess these factors among adults in the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a bilingual (English/Arabic), self-administered online questionnaire distributed via social media. The survey collected data on socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle-related risk factors, and cancer screening practices. Cancer knowledge was assessed using 59 items covering general knowledge, screenable cancers, warning signs and symptoms, and environmental risk factors. Attitudes perceived facilitators and barriers to screening were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Screening behavior was assessed as self-reported lifetime ("ever") participation in any cancer screening test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with screening practices. Results: A total of 811 individuals completed the study questionnaire, of whom only 36.5% reported having ever undergone any cancer screening test. Higher knowledge (OR = 1.022; 95% CI: 1.007-1.037) and more positive attitudes (OR = 1.091; 95% CI: 1.062-1.120) were associated with increased screening uptake. Older age (OR = 0.970; 95% CI: 0.955-0.985) and lower income (OR = 0.689; 95% CI: 0.483-0.982) were associated with a reduced likelihood of screening. Physician recommendation (47.0%) and early detection (45.3%) were the main motivators, while fear of results (39.5%), lack of symptoms (38.6%), and unfamiliarity with screening sites (38.5%) were the most common barriers. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate moderate cancer knowledge, variable screening attitudes, and multiple behavioral and system-level barriers. Knowledge, attitudes, age, and income, were significantly associated with lifetime screening participation, while physician recommendation and early detection emerged as key motivators. Targeted educational interventions and improved healthcare system navigation may enhance screening uptake in similar populations. However, findings should be interpreted with caution due to cross-sectional design, convenience sampling, reliance on self-reported lifetime screening, and the relatively young age distribution, which may limit causal inference and generalizability.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO), University of Alberta (CA), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Al Ain University (AE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), United Arab Emirates University (AE), Al-Quds University (PS), University of Sharjah (AE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.