Previously undocumented regional variability in crab‐eating macaque skull sexual dimorphism and its implications for biological and morphometric studies

In a large sample of adult crab-eating macaques, we quantified sexual dimorphism in size, shape, and covariance across the whole skull and among anatomical regions of the cranium and mandible. All regions showed significant mean sex differences, but the magnitude of size and shape dimorphism varied substantially. Shape dimorphism displayed particularly pronounced extremes of variation in specific regions. Males were consistently more variable than females. However, sex differences in size variance were significant, whereas differences in shape variance were typically nonsignificant. The chondrocranium deviated from this pattern, exhibiting an unusually large and significant difference in shape variance. Almost all regions differed significantly in shape covariance structure between sexes. To test whether these dimorphisms could be biased by the subsetting of landmarks, we compared each anatomical region with random subsets of equal dimensionality. Two regions, the vertical ramus of the mandible and the chondrocranium, emerged as unusually weakly dimorphic in both size and shape, unlike most other regions whose dimorphism was marked but within expectations from random subsets. The horizontal ramus showed the strongest shape dimorphism, but also in this case the result was not greater than found among random subsets. These analyses not only report previously undocumented regional variability in sex differences but also emphasize how between sex heteroscedasticity can be substantial. Such differences are biologically informative but suggest limitations to evolutionary comparisons by challenging common morphometric practices, such as statistical "sex-corrections" and pooling of sexes to increase sample size, as they may lead to misleading results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Anatomical Record
Published
2026-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70176
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Previously undocumented regional variability in crab‐eating macaque skull sexual dimorphism and its implications for biological and morphometric studies

Paul O'Higgins, Andrea Cardini
The Anatomical Record
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

Previously undocumented regional variability in crab‐eating macaque skull sexual dimorphism and its implications for biological and morphometric studies

Paul O'Higgins, Andrea Cardini
article en

Abstract

In a large sample of adult crab-eating macaques, we quantified sexual dimorphism in size, shape, and covariance across the whole skull and among anatomical regions of the cranium and mandible. All regions showed significant mean sex differences, but the magnitude of size and shape dimorphism varied substantially. Shape dimorphism displayed particularly pronounced extremes of variation in specific regions. Males were consistently more variable than females. However, sex differences in size variance were significant, whereas differences in shape variance were typically nonsignificant. The chondrocranium deviated from this pattern, exhibiting an unusually large and significant difference in shape variance. Almost all regions differed significantly in shape covariance structure between sexes. To test whether these dimorphisms could be biased by the subsetting of landmarks, we compared each anatomical region with random subsets of equal dimensionality. Two regions, the vertical ramus of the mandible and the chondrocranium, emerged as unusually weakly dimorphic in both size and shape, unlike most other regions whose dimorphism was marked but within expectations from random subsets. The horizontal ramus showed the strongest shape dimorphism, but also in this case the result was not greater than found among random subsets. These analyses not only report previously undocumented regional variability in sex differences but also emphasize how between sex heteroscedasticity can be substantial. Such differences are biologically informative but suggest limitations to evolutionary comparisons by challenging common morphometric practices, such as statistical "sex-corrections" and pooling of sexes to increase sample size, as they may lead to misleading results.

The Anatomical Record
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of York (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.