Application of reinforced U-shaped suture technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 165 consecutive cases

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major postoperative complication of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) that severely impacts surgical safety and patient prognosis. This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the reinforced U-shaped suture technique in reducing the incidence of POPF after LDP, and to identify independent risk factors for POPF to provide evidence-based references for clinical practice. Data were collected from 165 patients who underwent LDP between 2018 and February 2025 in our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the reinforcement technique employed for pancreatic stump closure: Group A: non-reinforced U-shaped suture with 113 patients; Group B: reinforced U-shaped suture with 52 patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline covariates between the two groups. Clinical data of all patients were collected, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen independent risk factors for POPF, and to compare the clinical outcomes of the two groups. Using multivariate analysis, pancreatic stump reinforcement technique, including our method, and other well-known POPF risk factors were independently assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified intraoperative bleeding (≥ 345.00 mL) (OR = 8.08, 95% CI: 2.41–27.11, p < 0.001) and non reinforced U-shaped suture (Group A, Group B OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05–0.65, p = 0.009) as independent risk factors for POPF. Additionally, pancreatic duct diameter ≥ 3.00 mm (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.39, p < 0.001) and hard pancreatic texture (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06–0.68, p = 0.011) were identified as independent protective factors for POPF. Compared with Group A, Group B had a significantly lower incidence of clinically relevant grade B/C POPF, and presented more favorable perioperative outcomes including shorter hospital stay and lower hospitalization costs. The reinforced U-shaped suture technique is a feasible and cost-effective pancreatic stump closure method for LDP, which is associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant grade B/C POPF and more favorable perioperative outcomes. Its proposed dual technical characteristics of staple-line mechanical stabilization and indirect pancreatic duct compression/sealing may contribute to the reduction of POPF risk, and the technique holds particular clinical value for high-risk populations awaiting further prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03719-0
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of reinforced U-shaped suture technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 165 consecutive cases

Jing Yu, Yujia Wu, Tingshuo Zhao, Zhigang Wei
BMC Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Application of reinforced U-shaped suture technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 165 consecutive cases

Jing Yu, Yujia Wu, Tingshuo Zhao, Zhigang Wei
article en

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major postoperative complication of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) that severely impacts surgical safety and patient prognosis. This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the reinforced U-shaped suture technique in reducing the incidence of POPF after LDP, and to identify independent risk factors for POPF to provide evidence-based references for clinical practice. Data were collected from 165 patients who underwent LDP between 2018 and February 2025 in our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the reinforcement technique employed for pancreatic stump closure: Group A: non-reinforced U-shaped suture with 113 patients; Group B: reinforced U-shaped suture with 52 patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline covariates between the two groups. Clinical data of all patients were collected, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen independent risk factors for POPF, and to compare the clinical outcomes of the two groups. Using multivariate analysis, pancreatic stump reinforcement technique, including our method, and other well-known POPF risk factors were independently assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified intraoperative bleeding (≥ 345.00 mL) (OR = 8.08, 95% CI: 2.41–27.11, p < 0.001) and non reinforced U-shaped suture (Group A, Group B OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05–0.65, p = 0.009) as independent risk factors for POPF. Additionally, pancreatic duct diameter ≥ 3.00 mm (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03–0.39, p < 0.001) and hard pancreatic texture (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06–0.68, p = 0.011) were identified as independent protective factors for POPF. Compared with Group A, Group B had a significantly lower incidence of clinically relevant grade B/C POPF, and presented more favorable perioperative outcomes including shorter hospital stay and lower hospitalization costs. The reinforced U-shaped suture technique is a feasible and cost-effective pancreatic stump closure method for LDP, which is associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant grade B/C POPF and more favorable perioperative outcomes. Its proposed dual technical characteristics of staple-line mechanical stabilization and indirect pancreatic duct compression/sealing may contribute to the reduction of POPF risk, and the technique holds particular clinical value for high-risk populations awaiting further prospective validation.

BMC Surgery
Shanxi Medical University (CN), First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (CN)
Health Commission of Shanxi Province, Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.