Protection for Arc High‐Resistance Grounding Faults in Active Distribution Networks With Low‐Resistance Grounding

Active distribution networks with low‐resistance grounding face a significant challenge under the dual‐carbon strategy. When a single‐phase arcing high‐resistance grounding fault occurs, the resulting zero‐sequence current is weak and unstable. Consequently, existing protection schemes for such faults are rendered ineffective. Considering the neutral points of both the main power grid and the distributed generation (DG) using low‐resistance grounding, the work established an arcing high‐resistance grounding fault model for active distribution networks. The current in the faulty feeder was approximately 180° out of phase with the current at the neutral point due to the transient characteristics of the zero‐sequence current in feeders and at the grid's neutral point. The phase difference between the zero‐sequence current in the healthy feeder without DG and the zero‐sequence current at the neutral point of the main power grid was approximately 90°. However, the phase of the zero‐sequence current in the healthy feeder with DG was approximately in phase with that at the neutral point of the main power grid. A protection method for arc high‐resistance grounding faults in active distribution networks with low‐resistance grounding was proposed based on the waveform similarity of zero‐sequence currents. The proposed protection principle was validated via PSCAD simulations. © 2026 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.70307
Primary Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protection for Arc High‐Resistance Grounding Faults in Active Distribution Networks With Low‐Resistance Grounding

Lin Yuan, Fengxian Zhao, Chunling Liu, Yingjia Sun et al.
IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Power Systems Fault Detection
article

Protection for Arc High‐Resistance Grounding Faults in Active Distribution Networks With Low‐Resistance Grounding

Lin Yuan, Fengxian Zhao, Chunling Liu, Yingjia Sun, Yongqin Li
article en

Abstract

Active distribution networks with low‐resistance grounding face a significant challenge under the dual‐carbon strategy. When a single‐phase arcing high‐resistance grounding fault occurs, the resulting zero‐sequence current is weak and unstable. Consequently, existing protection schemes for such faults are rendered ineffective. Considering the neutral points of both the main power grid and the distributed generation (DG) using low‐resistance grounding, the work established an arcing high‐resistance grounding fault model for active distribution networks. The current in the faulty feeder was approximately 180° out of phase with the current at the neutral point due to the transient characteristics of the zero‐sequence current in feeders and at the grid's neutral point. The phase difference between the zero‐sequence current in the healthy feeder without DG and the zero‐sequence current at the neutral point of the main power grid was approximately 90°. However, the phase of the zero‐sequence current in the healthy feeder with DG was approximately in phase with that at the neutral point of the main power grid. A protection method for arc high‐resistance grounding faults in active distribution networks with low‐resistance grounding was proposed based on the waveform similarity of zero‐sequence currents. The proposed protection principle was validated via PSCAD simulations. © 2026 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Liaoning University of Technology (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Power Systems Fault Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.