Sex differences in exploration–exploitation strategies during home-cage decision making

The exploration-exploitation trade-off refers to the conflict between using known strategies that reliably yield reward (exploitation) and sampling uncertain options that might yield better outcomes (exploration). Dysregulation of this balance is implicated in neuropsychiatric disease, and while sex differences in this balance have been described, the biological bases remain unclear. To quantify sex differences in this trade-off, we tested mice (n=74 male, 62 female) on four home-cage based foraging tasks with an operant pellet dispensing device, Feeding Experimentation Device 3 (FED3). Mice completed the tasks continuously over multiple days and the tasks were their only source of food. Across multiple tasks, males showed higher win-stay behaviour than females, indicating greater exploitation of previously rewarded actions, an effect that was modest in size but highly significant. Power analyses revealed that >30 mice per sex were needed to detect these modest but significant sex differences with 80% power. No consistent sex differences were observed in pellet intake, suggesting that differences in exploitation did not reflect differences in hunger drive or demand for pellets. Exploitation is a more efficient strategy when environmental parameters are fixed, while exploration can be more advantageous when parameters such as reward locations are changing and uncertain. We tested this idea by re-running our mice in a probabilistic foraging task, where actions led to uncertain probabilities of reward. While males continued to show higher levels of win-stay behaviour on this task, this no longer led to increases in accuracy. Behavioural modelling also supported this framework, demonstrating that stronger win-stay behaviour was most advantageous in deterministic models, and less advantageous in probabilistic models. Together, our findings demonstrate that male and female mice have small but significant differences in their exploration-exploitation balance, which leads to more accurate foraging in certain, but not uncertain, environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.02.716124
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in exploration–exploitation strategies during home-cage decision making

Matt Gaidica, Susan E. Maloney, Alex A. Legaria, Chantelle Murrell et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
article

Sex differences in exploration–exploitation strategies during home-cage decision making

Matt Gaidica, Susan E. Maloney, Alex A. Legaria, Chantelle Murrell, Alexxai V. Kravitz, Rebecca Chase, Joseph D. Dougherty, Naoki Hiratani, Mason Barrett, Andrew Nwacha, Sebastian Alves Ferreira Dias, Monsurat O Nasiru, Katie B McCullough
article en

Abstract

The exploration-exploitation trade-off refers to the conflict between using known strategies that reliably yield reward (exploitation) and sampling uncertain options that might yield better outcomes (exploration). Dysregulation of this balance is implicated in neuropsychiatric disease, and while sex differences in this balance have been described, the biological bases remain unclear. To quantify sex differences in this trade-off, we tested mice (n=74 male, 62 female) on four home-cage based foraging tasks with an operant pellet dispensing device, Feeding Experimentation Device 3 (FED3). Mice completed the tasks continuously over multiple days and the tasks were their only source of food. Across multiple tasks, males showed higher win-stay behaviour than females, indicating greater exploitation of previously rewarded actions, an effect that was modest in size but highly significant. Power analyses revealed that >30 mice per sex were needed to detect these modest but significant sex differences with 80% power. No consistent sex differences were observed in pellet intake, suggesting that differences in exploitation did not reflect differences in hunger drive or demand for pellets. Exploitation is a more efficient strategy when environmental parameters are fixed, while exploration can be more advantageous when parameters such as reward locations are changing and uncertain. We tested this idea by re-running our mice in a probabilistic foraging task, where actions led to uncertain probabilities of reward. While males continued to show higher levels of win-stay behaviour on this task, this no longer led to increases in accuracy. Behavioural modelling also supported this framework, demonstrating that stronger win-stay behaviour was most advantageous in deterministic models, and less advantageous in probabilistic models. Together, our findings demonstrate that male and female mice have small but significant differences in their exploration-exploitation balance, which leads to more accurate foraging in certain, but not uncertain, environments.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative, National Institutes of Health, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.