How AI influences engineering students’ competencies development: a literature review

Purpose This paper aims to discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) fosters the competencies demanded by engineering students to work in the Industry 4.0 (I4.0) context. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA method. The analysis encompassed 127 peer-reviewed articles (2022–2025), which were analysed to identify competencies, and their AI association. Findings The findings detail how engineering students’ competencies are developed based on AI use. Fourteen competencies are categorized as technical (i.e. automation, collaborativeness, programming, simulation), methodological (i.e. data analytics and modelling, problem-solving, analytical thinking, decision-making), social (i.e. teamwork) and personal (i.e. adaptability, communication, ethics, innovative behaviour, self-development learning). Practical implications This research can guide new educational methods that facilitate the development of students’ competencies applying AI, and guidelines on revising educational curricula affected by I4.0, which include support learning creation based on active learning to promote students as knowledge producers. Originality/value This paper provides a novel detailed synthesis of relevant competencies for engineering students and the AI contribution to competences development. The findings reply to research gaps on how AI supports technical and human-centred competencies for engineering students to act in the I4.0, which is underexplored in the current literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Learning Sciences
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-12-2025-0231
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI influences engineering students’ competencies development: a literature review

Vagner Batista Ribeiro, Jorge Muniz, Carla Diva de Oliveira Miraglia
Information and Learning Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

How AI influences engineering students’ competencies development: a literature review

Vagner Batista Ribeiro, Jorge Muniz, Carla Diva de Oliveira Miraglia
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) fosters the competencies demanded by engineering students to work in the Industry 4.0 (I4.0) context. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA method. The analysis encompassed 127 peer-reviewed articles (2022–2025), which were analysed to identify competencies, and their AI association. Findings The findings detail how engineering students’ competencies are developed based on AI use. Fourteen competencies are categorized as technical (i.e. automation, collaborativeness, programming, simulation), methodological (i.e. data analytics and modelling, problem-solving, analytical thinking, decision-making), social (i.e. teamwork) and personal (i.e. adaptability, communication, ethics, innovative behaviour, self-development learning). Practical implications This research can guide new educational methods that facilitate the development of students’ competencies applying AI, and guidelines on revising educational curricula affected by I4.0, which include support learning creation based on active learning to promote students as knowledge producers. Originality/value This paper provides a novel detailed synthesis of relevant competencies for engineering students and the AI contribution to competences development. The findings reply to research gaps on how AI supports technical and human-centred competencies for engineering students to act in the I4.0, which is underexplored in the current literature.

Information and Learning SciencesVol. 127(3-4)
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.