Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients: An Observational Study at a Large Tertiary Centre in Australia

Background: Older patients have been under-represented in clinical trials of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The safety of pulsed field ablation (PFA) in this cohort is not known. Methods: We conducted an observational study of consecutive patients undergoing PFA with a pentaspline catheter (Farapulse, Boston Scientific) for AF at a tertiary centre comparing procedural and clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥ 75 years (older cohort) versus < 75 years (younger cohort). Baseline demographics, procedural characteristics, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia > 30 s at any follow-up. Results: = 0.66). Conclusion: Pulsed field ablation for AF can be performed in older patients with acceptable procedural safety and clinical outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to further determine the safety and efficacy of PFA in older patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arrhythmia
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70336
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients: An Observational Study at a Large Tertiary Centre in Australia

Duron Prinsloo, Emily Kotschet, Hui Chen Han, Nitesh Nerlekar et al.
Journal of Arrhythmia
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients: An Observational Study at a Large Tertiary Centre in Australia

Duron Prinsloo, Emily Kotschet, Hui Chen Han, Nitesh Nerlekar, Adam J. Brown, Francis J. Ha
article en

Abstract

Background: Older patients have been under-represented in clinical trials of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The safety of pulsed field ablation (PFA) in this cohort is not known. Methods: We conducted an observational study of consecutive patients undergoing PFA with a pentaspline catheter (Farapulse, Boston Scientific) for AF at a tertiary centre comparing procedural and clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥ 75 years (older cohort) versus < 75 years (younger cohort). Baseline demographics, procedural characteristics, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia > 30 s at any follow-up. Results: = 0.66). Conclusion: Pulsed field ablation for AF can be performed in older patients with acceptable procedural safety and clinical outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to further determine the safety and efficacy of PFA in older patients.

Journal of ArrhythmiaVol. 42(2)
Australian Centre for Heart Health (AU)
National Heart Foundation of Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.