Three hundred sixty‐degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser during rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomic, functional and safety outcomes of intra-operative 360-degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser retinopexy during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to assess the certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched on June 27, 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating 360-degree versus focal laser during PPV for RRD were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias (ROB-2, NIH tools). Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models, and the certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. The primary outcome was single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and post-operative complications. RESULTS: = 0%, moderate certainty), cystoid macular oedema and macular hole were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive 360-degree laser retinopexy during PPV for RRD was associated with higher SSAS without a measurable increase in post-operative complications. However, no improvement in visual acuity outcomes was observed. Given the predominance of observational evidence, further well-designed randomized trials are warranted to clarify the magnitude of benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Ophthalmologica
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70127
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three hundred sixty‐degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser during rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Luke M. Yaldo, Abdelaziz Abdelaal, Albert C. Ting, Joshua Ong et al.
Acta Ophthalmologica
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Three hundred sixty‐degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser during rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Luke M. Yaldo, Abdelaziz Abdelaal, Albert C. Ting, Joshua Ong, Saif Pasha, Kyle Sporn
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomic, functional and safety outcomes of intra-operative 360-degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser retinopexy during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to assess the certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched on June 27, 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating 360-degree versus focal laser during PPV for RRD were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias (ROB-2, NIH tools). Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models, and the certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. The primary outcome was single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and post-operative complications. RESULTS: = 0%, moderate certainty), cystoid macular oedema and macular hole were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive 360-degree laser retinopexy during PPV for RRD was associated with higher SSAS without a measurable increase in post-operative complications. However, no improvement in visual acuity outcomes was observed. Given the predominance of observational evidence, further well-designed randomized trials are warranted to clarify the magnitude of benefit.

Acta Ophthalmologica
University of Miami (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education (CZ), Carilion Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.