Three hundred sixty‐degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser during rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
PURPOSE: To compare the anatomic, functional and safety outcomes of intra-operative 360-degree prophylactic laser retinopexy versus focal laser retinopexy during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to assess the certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched on June 27, 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating 360-degree versus focal laser during PPV for RRD were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias (ROB-2, NIH tools). Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models, and the certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. The primary outcome was single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and post-operative complications. RESULTS: = 0%, moderate certainty), cystoid macular oedema and macular hole were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive 360-degree laser retinopexy during PPV for RRD was associated with higher SSAS without a measurable increase in post-operative complications. However, no improvement in visual acuity outcomes was observed. Given the predominance of observational evidence, further well-designed randomized trials are warranted to clarify the magnitude of benefit.
Authors
- Luke M. Yaldo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-8335)
- Abdelaziz Abdelaal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3787-5970)
- Albert C. Ting
- Joshua Ong
- Saif Pasha
- Kyle Sporn
Institutions
- University of Miami (US)
- SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
- Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education (CZ)
- Carilion Clinic (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Ophthalmologica
- Published
- 2026-04-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70127
- Primary Topic
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00