“They Align Themselves With Us, Whereas I'm Aligned With the Patient”: A Multi‐Site Qualitative Study of Resident Physicians' Experiences With Law Enforcement in the Emergency Department

Background: Law enforcement is a common yet complicated presence in the emergency department (ED). Studies have found emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians have varied interactions with and attitudes toward law enforcement. EM resident physicians are in a uniquely formative professional period. However, the experiences and perspectives of EM resident physicians have not been previously explored in depth. Methods: We recruited EM resident physicians from three geopolitically distinct urban academic EDs in the United States to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences with law enforcement in the ED. We analyzed the transcripts thematically, looking for unifying concepts across institutions and latent meaning. A codebook was created and iteratively refined based on review of transcripts, after which salient themes were developed through ongoing discussions with the research team. Results: Twenty-four resident physicians across three sites participated. Three salient themes emerged from our study: ambiguity of authority between emergency physicians and law enforcement, concerns about the impact of law enforcement presence on patients, and disruptions to the ED team workflow. First, as trainees learning professional norms in the ED, participants reported difficulty navigating situations in which law enforcement attempted to assert authority over patient care. Second, participants perceived negative impacts of law enforcement presence on patients in custody and non-incarcerated patients of color receiving care in the ED. Finally, participants described frequent disruptions to the ED team workflow due to the presence of law enforcement. Participants relied on hospital security, rather than law enforcement, to ensure the safety of patients and staff. Conclusion: Emergency resident physicians described ambiguous boundaries and complex interactions among law enforcement, patients, and themselves in the ED. Although our study found several concerning impacts of law enforcement in the ED, these represent opportunities to clarify roles and responsibilities in the emergency physician-law enforcement relationship and improve patient care. Further research is needed, including eliciting perspectives of law enforcement and patients, particularly those with substance use disorders, trauma, and serious mental illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AEM Education and Training
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
45.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“They Align Themselves With Us, Whereas I'm Aligned With the Patient”: A Multi‐Site Qualitative Study of Resident Physicians' Experiences With Law Enforcement in the Emergency Department

Beatrice Torres, Josiah D. Rich, Ambrose H. Wong, Nkele A. Davis et al.
1 citations
AEM Education and Training
Torture, Ethics, and Law
45.70
article

“They Align Themselves With Us, Whereas I'm Aligned With the Patient”: A Multi‐Site Qualitative Study of Resident Physicians' Experiences With Law Enforcement in the Emergency Department

Beatrice Torres, Josiah D. Rich, Ambrose H. Wong, Nkele A. Davis, Bisan A. Salhi, Michelle Suh, Naomi P. Newton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Law enforcement is a common yet complicated presence in the emergency department (ED). Studies have found emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians have varied interactions with and attitudes toward law enforcement. EM resident physicians are in a uniquely formative professional period. However, the experiences and perspectives of EM resident physicians have not been previously explored in depth. Methods: We recruited EM resident physicians from three geopolitically distinct urban academic EDs in the United States to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences with law enforcement in the ED. We analyzed the transcripts thematically, looking for unifying concepts across institutions and latent meaning. A codebook was created and iteratively refined based on review of transcripts, after which salient themes were developed through ongoing discussions with the research team. Results: Twenty-four resident physicians across three sites participated. Three salient themes emerged from our study: ambiguity of authority between emergency physicians and law enforcement, concerns about the impact of law enforcement presence on patients, and disruptions to the ED team workflow. First, as trainees learning professional norms in the ED, participants reported difficulty navigating situations in which law enforcement attempted to assert authority over patient care. Second, participants perceived negative impacts of law enforcement presence on patients in custody and non-incarcerated patients of color receiving care in the ED. Finally, participants described frequent disruptions to the ED team workflow due to the presence of law enforcement. Participants relied on hospital security, rather than law enforcement, to ensure the safety of patients and staff. Conclusion: Emergency resident physicians described ambiguous boundaries and complex interactions among law enforcement, patients, and themselves in the ED. Although our study found several concerning impacts of law enforcement in the ED, these represent opportunities to clarify roles and responsibilities in the emergency physician-law enforcement relationship and improve patient care. Further research is needed, including eliciting perspectives of law enforcement and patients, particularly those with substance use disorders, trauma, and serious mental illness.

AEM Education and TrainingVol. 10(2)
Emory University (US), Brown University (US), Yale University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), New York University (US), Drexel University (US)
University of Chicago
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
45.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.