Older Adults, Anti‐Amyloid Therapy, and Frailty: What Oncology Can Teach Us

BACKGROUND: Anti-amyloid therapies, such as lecanemab or donanemab, represent the first disease-modifying treatments approved for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with confirmed amyloid pathology. Their implementation in routine care raises important challenges, particularly in older adults with heterogeneous functional reserve and multimorbidity. We address the role of frailty in refining clinical decision-making for anti-amyloid therapies. METHODS: This short communication presents a conceptual discussion informed by geriatric oncology, where frailty assessment and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) are routinely used to individualize treatment in heterogeneous older populations. We describe how similar principles may be applied to anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies once regulatory eligibility has been established, and outline a frailty-informed conceptual framework to support clinical decision-making in routine care. RESULTS: This conceptual analysis proposes a stepwise, frailty-informed clinical framework that integrates regulatory eligibility assessment with brief frailty screening and targeted comprehensive geriatric assessment. The framework defines differentiated clinical pathways for robust, pre-frail, and frail individuals, linking frailty status to specific decisions regarding treatment initiation, need for prehabilitation, intensity of monitoring, and consideration of treatment deferral. By embedding frailty assessment within routine clinical workflows, the framework operationalizes evaluation of physiological reserve, anticipates treatment burden and monitoring feasibility, and provides a structured approach to individualized risk-benefit appraisal for anti-amyloid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty-informed frameworks may offer a pragmatic and ethically grounded approach to support real-world implementation of anti-amyloid therapies, guiding treatment selection as well as longitudinal decisions on monitoring, continuation, and reassessment over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Neurology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.70567
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Older Adults, Anti‐Amyloid Therapy, and Frailty: What Oncology Can Teach Us

Miguel Germán Borda, Kevin O'Hara‐Veintimilla, Dag Aarsland
European Journal of Neurology
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Older Adults, Anti‐Amyloid Therapy, and Frailty: What Oncology Can Teach Us

Miguel Germán Borda, Kevin O'Hara‐Veintimilla, Dag Aarsland
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-amyloid therapies, such as lecanemab or donanemab, represent the first disease-modifying treatments approved for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with confirmed amyloid pathology. Their implementation in routine care raises important challenges, particularly in older adults with heterogeneous functional reserve and multimorbidity. We address the role of frailty in refining clinical decision-making for anti-amyloid therapies. METHODS: This short communication presents a conceptual discussion informed by geriatric oncology, where frailty assessment and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) are routinely used to individualize treatment in heterogeneous older populations. We describe how similar principles may be applied to anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies once regulatory eligibility has been established, and outline a frailty-informed conceptual framework to support clinical decision-making in routine care. RESULTS: This conceptual analysis proposes a stepwise, frailty-informed clinical framework that integrates regulatory eligibility assessment with brief frailty screening and targeted comprehensive geriatric assessment. The framework defines differentiated clinical pathways for robust, pre-frail, and frail individuals, linking frailty status to specific decisions regarding treatment initiation, need for prehabilitation, intensity of monitoring, and consideration of treatment deferral. By embedding frailty assessment within routine clinical workflows, the framework operationalizes evaluation of physiological reserve, anticipates treatment burden and monitoring feasibility, and provides a structured approach to individualized risk-benefit appraisal for anti-amyloid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty-informed frameworks may offer a pragmatic and ethically grounded approach to support real-world implementation of anti-amyloid therapies, guiding treatment selection as well as longitudinal decisions on monitoring, continuation, and reassessment over time.

European Journal of NeurologyVol. 33(4)
King's College London (GB), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), Clínica Rementería (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Helse Vest, Nasjonalforeningen for Folkehelsen
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.