Enhancing Investor Rationality: A Review of Behavioural Biases and the De-Biasing Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Investment Decision Making

Traditional financial theories assume that investors are rational individuals who make decisions based on all the information available at their disposal. However, insights from behavioural finance research suggest that investors frequently deviate from rationality because of the psychological and cognitive biases. These biases affect judgment and can result in suboptimal investment outcomes. The purpose of this study is to present a narrative review of important behavioural biases that influence investment decisions, as well as to examine how artificial intelligence-driven tools help in minimising their impact. The study adopts a narrative review approach, drawing insights from both foundational and recent literature on behavioural finance and financial technology. It analyses prior research to understand how different biases shape investor behaviour and decision-making processes. The review highlights cognitive biases, namely confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and overconfidence bias, that significantly influence investment choices. In addition, emotional biases further distort the decision-making process. The findings also indicate that AI-driven tools can support investors by offering objective, data-driven information, personalised recommendations, and help minimise the influence of biases, thereby improving decision quality. Overall, this study contributes to the growing literature by offering a clear understanding of the role of behavioural biases in investment decision-making and the corrective potential of AI-driven tools to address them. However, this study is limited by its reliance on secondary literature and the absence of empirical validation, which provides scope for future empirical research. It provides practical insights for investors, practitioners, and researchers seeking to navigate financial markets more effectively in a technology-driven environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2026/v26i42232
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Investor Rationality: A Review of Behavioural Biases and the De-Biasing Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Investment Decision Making

Sandeep Yadav, Rishi Kant
Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Enhancing Investor Rationality: A Review of Behavioural Biases and the De-Biasing Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Investment Decision Making

Sandeep Yadav, Rishi Kant
article en

Abstract

Traditional financial theories assume that investors are rational individuals who make decisions based on all the information available at their disposal. However, insights from behavioural finance research suggest that investors frequently deviate from rationality because of the psychological and cognitive biases. These biases affect judgment and can result in suboptimal investment outcomes. The purpose of this study is to present a narrative review of important behavioural biases that influence investment decisions, as well as to examine how artificial intelligence-driven tools help in minimising their impact. The study adopts a narrative review approach, drawing insights from both foundational and recent literature on behavioural finance and financial technology. It analyses prior research to understand how different biases shape investor behaviour and decision-making processes. The review highlights cognitive biases, namely confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and overconfidence bias, that significantly influence investment choices. In addition, emotional biases further distort the decision-making process. The findings also indicate that AI-driven tools can support investors by offering objective, data-driven information, personalised recommendations, and help minimise the influence of biases, thereby improving decision quality. Overall, this study contributes to the growing literature by offering a clear understanding of the role of behavioural biases in investment decision-making and the corrective potential of AI-driven tools to address them. However, this study is limited by its reliance on secondary literature and the absence of empirical validation, which provides scope for future empirical research. It provides practical insights for investors, practitioners, and researchers seeking to navigate financial markets more effectively in a technology-driven environment.

Asian Journal of Economics Business and AccountingVol. 26(4)
University of Lucknow (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.