Measuring the added benefits of decentralized trial elements (SHASTA): impact on enrollment, demographics, and data completeness through a single sponsor

Abstract This paper explores the impact of decentralized clinical trial (DCT) elements through a single Sponsor’s perspective, measuring outcomes such as enrollment rate, baseline demographics, and data quality. Analyzing data from six studies – including four interventional and two observational – provides insights into the efficacy and challenges of implementing DCTs. While decentralized approaches offer enhanced data completeness due to direct access to medical records and ancillary care, they also present significant data collection burden. For example, obtaining and abstracting relevant information from medical records is a substantial effort. The study highlights that while DCTs are promising, they are not a universal solution. Having more tangible metrics around benefits and limitations will help researchers design more fit-for-purpose approaches. Moreover, the skills and infrastructure developed for DCTs can pave the way for future decentralized healthcare. As patients become increasingly digitally savvy, the integration of technology into clinical trials is expected to enhance convenience and improve informed health decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46193-7
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the added benefits of decentralized trial elements (SHASTA): impact on enrollment, demographics, and data completeness through a single sponsor

Kimberly E. Barnholt, Seema Asthana, Anna H. Yang, Ben Trzaskoma et al.
Scientific Reports
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Measuring the added benefits of decentralized trial elements (SHASTA): impact on enrollment, demographics, and data completeness through a single sponsor

Kimberly E. Barnholt, Seema Asthana, Anna H. Yang, Ben Trzaskoma, Rozanno Gonzales, Rekha Shivapa, James Donohue, Elizabeth Mandel
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the impact of decentralized clinical trial (DCT) elements through a single Sponsor’s perspective, measuring outcomes such as enrollment rate, baseline demographics, and data quality. Analyzing data from six studies – including four interventional and two observational – provides insights into the efficacy and challenges of implementing DCTs. While decentralized approaches offer enhanced data completeness due to direct access to medical records and ancillary care, they also present significant data collection burden. For example, obtaining and abstracting relevant information from medical records is a substantial effort. The study highlights that while DCTs are promising, they are not a universal solution. Having more tangible metrics around benefits and limitations will help researchers design more fit-for-purpose approaches. Moreover, the skills and infrastructure developed for DCTs can pave the way for future decentralized healthcare. As patients become increasingly digitally savvy, the integration of technology into clinical trials is expected to enhance convenience and improve informed health decisions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Gene Therapy Laboratory (FR)
Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.