Tracing the gaps: A global snapshot

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traceability of blood components ensures patient safety, allowing bidirectional tracing of donors and recipients. Records must be kept for defined intervals and stored safely to ensure data integrity. Compliance must be regularly assessed, with clear accountability and actions for deficiencies. All transfusion staff must be trained in traceability to promote safe practices. The global survey aimed to identify the current status of blood components traceability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Haemovigilance in collaboration with International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) and Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) conducted a global survey in traceability, built using Online Surveys by Jisc and distributed to the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Responses were analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: There were 212 responses from 43 countries. In 201/212 (95%), a law or regulation for traceability was reported, and in 189/201 (94%) traceability was bidirectional. Retention periods for records were variable, with ≥30 years being the most common (117/195; 60%). The Ministry of Health (118/212; 56%) and/or regulatory bodies (189/212; 89%) were most often the responsible organizations for monitoring traceability. Training in traceability for transfusion staff was reported in 139/212 (66%). In 32/212 (17%), there was at least one recall where a donor or recipient could not be traced. Records stored in computers (28/212; 13%), hard copies (22/212; 10%) or both (132/212; 62%) were reported. Of those with legacy systems (84/160; 53%), 18 stated that these were not safely managed. A haemovigilance system or equivalent was reported in 171/212 (81%) responses. The main challenges identified were unavailability of information technology (139/212; 66%) and staffing issues (137/212; 65%). CONCLUSION: This survey highlights wide global variation of traceability practices and highlights critical risks requiring urgent action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vox Sanguinis
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70262
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the gaps: A global snapshot

Barbee Whitaker, Paul Ashford, Nicola Swarbrick, Shruthi Narayan et al.
Vox Sanguinis
Blood donation and transfusion practices
article

Tracing the gaps: A global snapshot

Barbee Whitaker, Paul Ashford, Nicola Swarbrick, Shruthi Narayan, Gopal Patidar, Jennifer Davies, Mary Townsend, Vera Rosa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traceability of blood components ensures patient safety, allowing bidirectional tracing of donors and recipients. Records must be kept for defined intervals and stored safely to ensure data integrity. Compliance must be regularly assessed, with clear accountability and actions for deficiencies. All transfusion staff must be trained in traceability to promote safe practices. The global survey aimed to identify the current status of blood components traceability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Haemovigilance in collaboration with International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) and Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) conducted a global survey in traceability, built using Online Surveys by Jisc and distributed to the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Responses were analysed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: There were 212 responses from 43 countries. In 201/212 (95%), a law or regulation for traceability was reported, and in 189/201 (94%) traceability was bidirectional. Retention periods for records were variable, with ≥30 years being the most common (117/195; 60%). The Ministry of Health (118/212; 56%) and/or regulatory bodies (189/212; 89%) were most often the responsible organizations for monitoring traceability. Training in traceability for transfusion staff was reported in 139/212 (66%). In 32/212 (17%), there was at least one recall where a donor or recipient could not be traced. Records stored in computers (28/212; 13%), hard copies (22/212; 10%) or both (132/212; 62%) were reported. Of those with legacy systems (84/160; 53%), 18 stated that these were not safely managed. A haemovigilance system or equivalent was reported in 171/212 (81%) responses. The main challenges identified were unavailability of information technology (139/212; 66%) and staffing issues (137/212; 65%). CONCLUSION: This survey highlights wide global variation of traceability practices and highlights critical risks requiring urgent action.

Vox Sanguinis
Serco (United Kingdom) (GB), Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Implant Sciences (United States) (US), Phoenix (United States) (US), Arizona Research Center (US), Information Management Consultants (United States) (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.