Modeling the Resilience of Multimodal Freight Networks Under Disruptions: A Systematic Review

Multimodal freight transportation networks are increasingly exposed to natural and human-made disruptions, yet prior research remains fragmented in how disruptions are represented, which modeling techniques are applied, and how results are validated, limiting comparability and actionable guidance for resilient planning. This study presents a PRISMA-guided systematic review of disruption modeling in multimodal freight networks. A total of 21 studies were identified and coded to address three research questions concerning (RQ1) which analytical and computational modeling techniques are applied; (RQ2) to what extent models represent cross-modal interdependencies, cascading failures, and recovery processes; and (RQ3) what validation, calibration, and empirical testing strategies are employed. The review shows that optimization-based approaches and hybrid frameworks dominate the literature, complemented by fewer network science and data-driven methods. Most studies model disruptions as node/link failures and/or capacity degradation using static single-event scenarios, and explicit representations of cascading effects, operational delay propagation, and time-evolving recovery trajectories remain relatively rare. While many studies rely on real network data, formal calibration and historical backtesting against observed disruption events are uncommon, and validation is primarily case study-based. These findings highlight the need for more dynamic resilience modeling, stronger uncertainty quantification, standardized reporting of performance and resilience metrics, and greater use of empirically grounded validation to improve the generalizability and decision relevance of multimodal freight resilience models.