Using Large Language Models in Public Health Platforms: A Study of Platform Users’ and Editors’ Perspectives on Trust, Ethics and Risks

In the Netherlands, several public health platforms provide information and peer support to different patient groups such as people suffering from cancer or multiple sclerosis. With the rapid growth and development of Large Language Models (LLMs) in multiple sectors, these health platforms are considering the use of LLMs for personalized content generation and ease of information management. However, the sensitive nature of health information and personal experiences shared on such platforms introduces privacy and ethical risks, such as misinformation and bias. This study explores the concerns and risks associated with LLMs through interviews and focus groups with platform editors and users who use and access these platforms. Our findings show that risks related to content quality and quantity were most frequently identified. Moreover, the findings highlight the importance of disclosure if there is no human oversight, participants’ strong opposition to AI-generated blogs, and the potential of LLMs for personalization, provided users retain control over what they read. This work contributes to the ongoing discussion in human-centered computing about the ethical challenges and risks of adopting LLMs by presenting an empirical evaluation with editors and users. Moreover, the insights inform considerations and design guidelines for implementing LLMs on public health platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3806649
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Large Language Models in Public Health Platforms: A Study of Platform Users’ and Editors’ Perspectives on Trust, Ethics and Risks

Supraja Sankaran, Emiel Krahmer, Anniek Jansen
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Using Large Language Models in Public Health Platforms: A Study of Platform Users’ and Editors’ Perspectives on Trust, Ethics and Risks

Supraja Sankaran, Emiel Krahmer, Anniek Jansen
article en

Abstract

In the Netherlands, several public health platforms provide information and peer support to different patient groups such as people suffering from cancer or multiple sclerosis. With the rapid growth and development of Large Language Models (LLMs) in multiple sectors, these health platforms are considering the use of LLMs for personalized content generation and ease of information management. However, the sensitive nature of health information and personal experiences shared on such platforms introduces privacy and ethical risks, such as misinformation and bias. This study explores the concerns and risks associated with LLMs through interviews and focus groups with platform editors and users who use and access these platforms. Our findings show that risks related to content quality and quantity were most frequently identified. Moreover, the findings highlight the importance of disclosure if there is no human oversight, participants’ strong opposition to AI-generated blogs, and the potential of LLMs for personalization, provided users retain control over what they read. This work contributes to the ongoing discussion in human-centered computing about the ethical challenges and risks of adopting LLMs by presenting an empirical evaluation with editors and users. Moreover, the insights inform considerations and design guidelines for implementing LLMs on public health platforms.

ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Tilburg University (NL), Digital Science (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.