Concrete jungle to urban oasis: evaluating scale, vegetation cover, and aggregation of urban greenspaces on wildlife

Urban greenspaces are a haven for wildlife in densely populated cities. Wildlife use greenspaces for resource acquisition, shelter, and travel across urbanized landscapes. Greenspace metrics such as herbaceous or woody landcover, size, patchiness, and human land use influence species richness. Considering these metrics in urban greenspace design could influence valuable resources for wildlife, the goals of this study were to: 1) determine wildlife communities in different greenspace types, and 2) identify and quantify greenspace metrics to determine relationships with wildlife at various spatial scales. To monitor wildlife, twenty‐six camera traps were set in eastern Los Angeles County, California. Greenspace metrics were gathered using 3 m landcover supervised classification and FRAGSTATS. Non‐metric multidimensional scaling was used to determine wildlife community composition and a generalized linear mixed model was selected to determine the influence of greenspace metrics on richness at four scales (200 m, 500 m, 1 km, and 2 km). Urban dweller species like the Northern mockingbird, Virginia opossum, and desert cottontail were commonly found in suburban yards and urban open modified greenspaces such as a commercial plant nursery. Species like the band‐tailed pigeon, gray fox, and black bear had increased presence in natural greenspaces. Large‐scale greenspaces 1 km and 2 km in size, with high herbaceous cover (either as increasing aggregated patches or increased patchiness), and moderate levels of woody cover, positively influence species richness. At smaller scales, 200 m and 500 m, low and high levels of herbaceous cover and high levels of woody cover strongly and positively influence richness. These results suggest that fragmented greenspaces with varying levels of herbaceous and woody cover contribute to increasing wildlife richness in urban regions. From the perspective of urban planning, developing greenspaces from an ecological scale is important to ensure they function as stepping stones in the urban matrix. Understanding these patterns can improve greenspaces that support wildlife and ecological functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01528
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concrete jungle to urban oasis: evaluating scale, vegetation cover, and aggregation of urban greenspaces on wildlife

Janel L. Ortiz, Adrianna J. Elihu
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Concrete jungle to urban oasis: evaluating scale, vegetation cover, and aggregation of urban greenspaces on wildlife

Janel L. Ortiz, Adrianna J. Elihu
article en

Abstract

Urban greenspaces are a haven for wildlife in densely populated cities. Wildlife use greenspaces for resource acquisition, shelter, and travel across urbanized landscapes. Greenspace metrics such as herbaceous or woody landcover, size, patchiness, and human land use influence species richness. Considering these metrics in urban greenspace design could influence valuable resources for wildlife, the goals of this study were to: 1) determine wildlife communities in different greenspace types, and 2) identify and quantify greenspace metrics to determine relationships with wildlife at various spatial scales. To monitor wildlife, twenty‐six camera traps were set in eastern Los Angeles County, California. Greenspace metrics were gathered using 3 m landcover supervised classification and FRAGSTATS. Non‐metric multidimensional scaling was used to determine wildlife community composition and a generalized linear mixed model was selected to determine the influence of greenspace metrics on richness at four scales (200 m, 500 m, 1 km, and 2 km). Urban dweller species like the Northern mockingbird, Virginia opossum, and desert cottontail were commonly found in suburban yards and urban open modified greenspaces such as a commercial plant nursery. Species like the band‐tailed pigeon, gray fox, and black bear had increased presence in natural greenspaces. Large‐scale greenspaces 1 km and 2 km in size, with high herbaceous cover (either as increasing aggregated patches or increased patchiness), and moderate levels of woody cover, positively influence species richness. At smaller scales, 200 m and 500 m, low and high levels of herbaceous cover and high levels of woody cover strongly and positively influence richness. These results suggest that fragmented greenspaces with varying levels of herbaceous and woody cover contribute to increasing wildlife richness in urban regions. From the perspective of urban planning, developing greenspaces from an ecological scale is important to ensure they function as stepping stones in the urban matrix. Understanding these patterns can improve greenspaces that support wildlife and ecological functions.

Wildlife Biology
California State Polytechnic University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.