A Narrative Review of Inclusive Research Practices

ABSTRACT Inclusive research recognises the right of people with intellectual disability to collaborate, lead and direct research projects rather than participate only as subjects. Researchers have a responsibility to make the process of research accessible and open to researchers with disability. This narrative review is a response to Walmsley et al.'s article that discusses the value of inclusive research. The review aimed to provide an update on the progression of inclusive research and ascertain current practices and strategies for inclusive research whilst identifying and analysing gaps in knowledge. Thematic analysis of papers identified four areas underpinning inclusive research: (1) highlighting the voices of people with intellectual disability in research; (2) ensuring accessible research; (3) encouraging collaborative research; and (4) committing to reflexive improvement. However, the literature also indicated that there is no standard practice when it comes to inclusive research. This highlights the need for a uniform curriculum for inclusive research training that ensures the active participation of people with intellectual disability within research projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70057
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Narrative Review of Inclusive Research Practices

Julian Norman Trollor, Sian Anderson, Morag Kelly, Gisselle Gallego et al.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Disability Rights and Representation
article

A Narrative Review of Inclusive Research Practices

Julian Norman Trollor, Sian Anderson, Morag Kelly, Gisselle Gallego, Mary‐Ann O'Donovan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inclusive research recognises the right of people with intellectual disability to collaborate, lead and direct research projects rather than participate only as subjects. Researchers have a responsibility to make the process of research accessible and open to researchers with disability. This narrative review is a response to Walmsley et al.'s article that discusses the value of inclusive research. The review aimed to provide an update on the progression of inclusive research and ascertain current practices and strategies for inclusive research whilst identifying and analysing gaps in knowledge. Thematic analysis of papers identified four areas underpinning inclusive research: (1) highlighting the voices of people with intellectual disability in research; (2) ensuring accessible research; (3) encouraging collaborative research; and (4) committing to reflexive improvement. However, the literature also indicated that there is no standard practice when it comes to inclusive research. This highlights the need for a uniform curriculum for inclusive research training that ensures the active participation of people with intellectual disability within research projects.

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 23(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.