Quality-Guided Subset Selection for Bacterial Microscopy Classification: A Compact Multi-Seed Benchmark on DIBaS

This preprint presents a reproducible bacterial microscopy classification benchmark built on the Digital Images of Bacterial Species (DIBaS) dataset using a ResNet18 backbone, explicit image-quality review, and multi-seed evaluation. The prepared dataset contains 629 images across 30 classes. The study compares a baseline training pipeline against a quality-guided subset-selection arm derived from blur, contrast, and brightness cues. Across three seeds, the baseline achieved 0.9719±0.0122 accuracy and 0.9701±0.0127 macro-F1, while the quality-guided arm achieved 0.9298±0.0161 accuracy and 0.9275±0.0147 macro-F1. The main conclusion is methodological: strict threshold-based quality control proved too restrictive in this compact setting, so the final subset-selection mechanism relied on ranked class-preserving rescue. This record contains the manuscript PDF for citation and public access.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19441510
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality-Guided Subset Selection for Bacterial Microscopy Classification: A Compact Multi-Seed Benchmark on DIBaS

Krishna Sai Pokala
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Quality-Guided Subset Selection for Bacterial Microscopy Classification: A Compact Multi-Seed Benchmark on DIBaS

Krishna Sai Pokala
article en

Abstract

This preprint presents a reproducible bacterial microscopy classification benchmark built on the Digital Images of Bacterial Species (DIBaS) dataset using a ResNet18 backbone, explicit image-quality review, and multi-seed evaluation. The prepared dataset contains 629 images across 30 classes. The study compares a baseline training pipeline against a quality-guided subset-selection arm derived from blur, contrast, and brightness cues. Across three seeds, the baseline achieved 0.9719±0.0122 accuracy and 0.9701±0.0127 macro-F1, while the quality-guided arm achieved 0.9298±0.0161 accuracy and 0.9275±0.0147 macro-F1. The main conclusion is methodological: strict threshold-based quality control proved too restrictive in this compact setting, so the final subset-selection mechanism relied on ranked class-preserving rescue. This record contains the manuscript PDF for citation and public access.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.