New integrated CCS and CCU schemes with small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plant: A Comparative techno-economic assessment
This study presents a unified techno-economic assessment of conventional and membrane-enabled carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) integrated into small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plants. A novel contribution is the first side-by-side evaluation of a fully membrane-based post-combustion CO 2 capture system for CCS and a membrane reactor-assisted CCU configuration within a consistent Aspen HYSYS framework under identical system boundaries. Membrane integration significantly enhanced energy performance, eliminating hot-utility demand and reducing specific energy consumption by 43% in CCS. In CCU, the membrane reactor achieved higher hydrocarbon selectivity at residence times 62% shorter than in conventional reactors, implying proportional reductions in reactor size and capital expenditure. Capital costs decreased by 12% for CCS and up to 24% for CCU. Despite higher utility demand, membrane-assisted CCU increased value-added fuel production by 31.3%. Sensitivity analysis identified membrane cost, lifetime, and utility prices as key levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) drivers. A 300% increase in natural gas prices raised LCOE from −96 to 584 USD/MWh, while hydrogen prices above 3000 USD/t rendered several CCU pathways unviable. Overall, membrane-enabled systems show strong potential, contingent on optimised membrane performance and hydrogen costs. • Membrane-enabled CCS eliminates hot-utility demand, reducing specific energy consumption by ∼43%. • Membrane process intensification reduces reactor size by ∼62% while increasing value-added fuel production by 31.3%. • Compact membrane-based CCS and CCU designs lower material and capital intensity by up to 24%. • Integrated CCS/CCU pathways improve carbon utilization efficiency in decentralised biogas power systems. • Sustainability and economic viability are governed by membrane durability and low-carbon hydrogen and utility prices.
Authors
- Simona Liguori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9061-0475)
- Adele Brunetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4545-6637)
- Kamran Ghasemzadeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-0737)
- Maria‐Chiara Ferrari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4025-1237)
- Mostafa Jafari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-5341)
- Rashid Jamshidi
Institutions
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- Clarkson University (US)
- University of Tehran (IR)
- National Research Council (IT)
- Institute on Membrane Technology (IT)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Fuel Processing Technology
- Published
- 2026-04-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2026.108449
- Primary Topic
- Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Commission