New integrated CCS and CCU schemes with small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plant: A Comparative techno-economic assessment

This study presents a unified techno-economic assessment of conventional and membrane-enabled carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) integrated into small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plants. A novel contribution is the first side-by-side evaluation of a fully membrane-based post-combustion CO 2 capture system for CCS and a membrane reactor-assisted CCU configuration within a consistent Aspen HYSYS framework under identical system boundaries. Membrane integration significantly enhanced energy performance, eliminating hot-utility demand and reducing specific energy consumption by 43% in CCS. In CCU, the membrane reactor achieved higher hydrocarbon selectivity at residence times 62% shorter than in conventional reactors, implying proportional reductions in reactor size and capital expenditure. Capital costs decreased by 12% for CCS and up to 24% for CCU. Despite higher utility demand, membrane-assisted CCU increased value-added fuel production by 31.3%. Sensitivity analysis identified membrane cost, lifetime, and utility prices as key levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) drivers. A 300% increase in natural gas prices raised LCOE from −96 to 584 USD/MWh, while hydrogen prices above 3000 USD/t rendered several CCU pathways unviable. Overall, membrane-enabled systems show strong potential, contingent on optimised membrane performance and hydrogen costs. • Membrane-enabled CCS eliminates hot-utility demand, reducing specific energy consumption by ∼43%. • Membrane process intensification reduces reactor size by ∼62% while increasing value-added fuel production by 31.3%. • Compact membrane-based CCS and CCU designs lower material and capital intensity by up to 24%. • Integrated CCS/CCU pathways improve carbon utilization efficiency in decentralised biogas power systems. • Sustainability and economic viability are governed by membrane durability and low-carbon hydrogen and utility prices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Processing Technology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2026.108449
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New integrated CCS and CCU schemes with small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plant: A Comparative techno-economic assessment

Simona Liguori, Adele Brunetti, Kamran Ghasemzadeh, Maria‐Chiara Ferrari et al.
Fuel Processing Technology
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

New integrated CCS and CCU schemes with small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plant: A Comparative techno-economic assessment

Simona Liguori, Adele Brunetti, Kamran Ghasemzadeh, Maria‐Chiara Ferrari, Mostafa Jafari, Rashid Jamshidi
article en

Abstract

This study presents a unified techno-economic assessment of conventional and membrane-enabled carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) integrated into small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle power plants. A novel contribution is the first side-by-side evaluation of a fully membrane-based post-combustion CO 2 capture system for CCS and a membrane reactor-assisted CCU configuration within a consistent Aspen HYSYS framework under identical system boundaries. Membrane integration significantly enhanced energy performance, eliminating hot-utility demand and reducing specific energy consumption by 43% in CCS. In CCU, the membrane reactor achieved higher hydrocarbon selectivity at residence times 62% shorter than in conventional reactors, implying proportional reductions in reactor size and capital expenditure. Capital costs decreased by 12% for CCS and up to 24% for CCU. Despite higher utility demand, membrane-assisted CCU increased value-added fuel production by 31.3%. Sensitivity analysis identified membrane cost, lifetime, and utility prices as key levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) drivers. A 300% increase in natural gas prices raised LCOE from −96 to 584 USD/MWh, while hydrogen prices above 3000 USD/t rendered several CCU pathways unviable. Overall, membrane-enabled systems show strong potential, contingent on optimised membrane performance and hydrogen costs. • Membrane-enabled CCS eliminates hot-utility demand, reducing specific energy consumption by ∼43%. • Membrane process intensification reduces reactor size by ∼62% while increasing value-added fuel production by 31.3%. • Compact membrane-based CCS and CCU designs lower material and capital intensity by up to 24%. • Integrated CCS/CCU pathways improve carbon utilization efficiency in decentralised biogas power systems. • Sustainability and economic viability are governed by membrane durability and low-carbon hydrogen and utility prices.

Fuel Processing TechnologyVol. 286
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Clarkson University (US), University of Tehran (IR), National Research Council (IT), Institute on Membrane Technology (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.