Vital staining adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders

BACKGROUND: Improvements in disease progression and treatment can coincide with the early detection of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Although biopsy is the standard for diagnosing these conditions, adjuncts like vital staining are less invasive and could potentially indicate when biopsy is necessary. In this living systematic review, the authors summarize the diagnostic test accuracy and impact of vital staining among adults with or without lesions. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 25, 2025. Independent paired reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The authors assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and reported results in summary of findings tables. RESULTS: In 1 study, the researchers evaluated the impact of vital staining, specifically toluidine blue, to screen adults without lesions. No adverse events (moderate certainty) were reported. The rate ratio for oral cancer incidence was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.24 to 1.23; low certainty) and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.03 to 2.94; very low certainty) for malignant transformation. The authors included 36 studies on diagnostic test accuracy in adults with lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (2,770 lesions, 35 studies) was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90; very low certainty) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.76; very low certainty), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The effects of vital staining in people with and without lesions in primary care settings are very uncertain due to serious risk of bias and indirectness. Among adults with lesions, the data suggest many false-positive results are expected, which are associated with downstream consequences like unnecessary biopsies and emotional burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2026.01.008
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vital staining adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders

Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, Ana María Rojas-Gómez, MW Lingen, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer et al.
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
article

Vital staining adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders

Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, Ana María Rojas-Gómez, MW Lingen, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Matthias Wallach Weinstein, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Kelly K. O’Brien, Olivia Urquhart
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in disease progression and treatment can coincide with the early detection of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Although biopsy is the standard for diagnosing these conditions, adjuncts like vital staining are less invasive and could potentially indicate when biopsy is necessary. In this living systematic review, the authors summarize the diagnostic test accuracy and impact of vital staining among adults with or without lesions. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through November 25, 2025. Independent paired reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The authors assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and reported results in summary of findings tables. RESULTS: In 1 study, the researchers evaluated the impact of vital staining, specifically toluidine blue, to screen adults without lesions. No adverse events (moderate certainty) were reported. The rate ratio for oral cancer incidence was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.24 to 1.23; low certainty) and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.03 to 2.94; very low certainty) for malignant transformation. The authors included 36 studies on diagnostic test accuracy in adults with lesions. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (2,770 lesions, 35 studies) was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90; very low certainty) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.76; very low certainty), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The effects of vital staining in people with and without lesions in primary care settings are very uncertain due to serious risk of bias and indirectness. Among adults with lesions, the data suggest many false-positive results are expected, which are associated with downstream consequences like unnecessary biopsies and emotional burden.

The Journal of the American Dental Association
American Dental Association (US), American Library Association (US), Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Chicago (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
ADA Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.