Psychological Screening and Support for Patients Enrolled in Early‐Phase Cancer Clinical Trials and the Possible Barriers: A Real‐World Tertiary Center Implementation Study

INTRODUCTION: One in three patients with cancer suffers from clinically significant depression and/or anxiety. Early-phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCTs) frequently include patients with advanced disease with limited treatment options. However, screening for psychological symptoms is not routinely performed in this setting. Here, we describe a mixed-methods implementation study exploring the feasibility of improving access to psychological screening in EPCCTs and assessing how electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) can be utilized to identify those requiring intervention. METHODS: Perceived benefits and challenges associated with psychological screening in EPCCTs were explored from the clinician, psycho-oncology team, and patient and carer's perspectives, via clinician surveys and a patient and carer focus group. A standard workflow was created to enable routine psychological screening, alongside a stepped-care model for providing support. An ePROM, consisting of PHQ-2 and GAD-7 questionnaires, was distributed to patients enrolling on EPCCTs. RESULTS: Of the 17 clinicians who responded, 88% felt that routine psychological assessments were important, and 100% were willing to complete assessments with patients. Perceived barriers were identified relating to 4 main themes: resources, support services, training and staff misconceptions. Invitations to ePROMs were sent to 92 patients over 12 months and 59 (64.1%) have responded at baseline; of these, 13 (22.0%) patients have received intervention based on PHQ-2/GAD-7 score. Initial challenges associated with ePROM completion related to technological difficulties, missed notifications and form expiration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that routine psychological assessments in EPCCTs may help identify previously undiagnosed psychological burden in patients, and facilitate their access to appropriate, timely support. This implementation study indicates this approach can be feasibly delivered through the use of ePROMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psycho-Oncology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70446
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Screening and Support for Patients Enrolled in Early‐Phase Cancer Clinical Trials and the Possible Barriers: A Real‐World Tertiary Center Implementation Study

Matt Krebs, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Donna M. Graham, Harriet Morley et al.
Psycho-Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Psychological Screening and Support for Patients Enrolled in Early‐Phase Cancer Clinical Trials and the Possible Barriers: A Real‐World Tertiary Center Implementation Study

Matt Krebs, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Donna M. Graham, Harriet Morley, Louise Carter, AB Smith, Ruiyang Yan, Matthew D. Robinson
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One in three patients with cancer suffers from clinically significant depression and/or anxiety. Early-phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCTs) frequently include patients with advanced disease with limited treatment options. However, screening for psychological symptoms is not routinely performed in this setting. Here, we describe a mixed-methods implementation study exploring the feasibility of improving access to psychological screening in EPCCTs and assessing how electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) can be utilized to identify those requiring intervention. METHODS: Perceived benefits and challenges associated with psychological screening in EPCCTs were explored from the clinician, psycho-oncology team, and patient and carer's perspectives, via clinician surveys and a patient and carer focus group. A standard workflow was created to enable routine psychological screening, alongside a stepped-care model for providing support. An ePROM, consisting of PHQ-2 and GAD-7 questionnaires, was distributed to patients enrolling on EPCCTs. RESULTS: Of the 17 clinicians who responded, 88% felt that routine psychological assessments were important, and 100% were willing to complete assessments with patients. Perceived barriers were identified relating to 4 main themes: resources, support services, training and staff misconceptions. Invitations to ePROMs were sent to 92 patients over 12 months and 59 (64.1%) have responded at baseline; of these, 13 (22.0%) patients have received intervention based on PHQ-2/GAD-7 score. Initial challenges associated with ePROM completion related to technological difficulties, missed notifications and form expiration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that routine psychological assessments in EPCCTs may help identify previously undiagnosed psychological burden in patients, and facilitate their access to appropriate, timely support. This implementation study indicates this approach can be feasibly delivered through the use of ePROMs.

Psycho-OncologyVol. 35(4)
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.