A Reply to Duffy et al. on Their Reactions to the Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale

PURPOSE: This reply provides a response to the issues raised by Duffy et al. (2026) regarding our recent article. Despite the many points of agreement with the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS) authors that are clarified further in this response, some of the operational definitions we proposed are related to concerns that we think deserve discussion in the research community. Specifically, we argue that the item composition of the ASRS, a scale that has been developed and successfully used for progressive apraxia of speech, overlooks central features of apraxia of speech in stroke for reasons that are not convincing. CONCLUSIONS: The ASRS has made a substantial impact to the study of apraxia of speech by standardizing and explicating the diagnostic process, uncovering the potential subtypes of apraxia of speech, and stimulating further study and discussion about this area. However, it is our experience that modifications are needed to use it confidently with stroke populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00598
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reply to Duffy et al. on Their Reactions to the Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale

Katarina L. Haley, Adam Jacks, Marja-Liisa Mailend
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

A Reply to Duffy et al. on Their Reactions to the Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale

Katarina L. Haley, Adam Jacks, Marja-Liisa Mailend
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This reply provides a response to the issues raised by Duffy et al. (2026) regarding our recent article. Despite the many points of agreement with the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS) authors that are clarified further in this response, some of the operational definitions we proposed are related to concerns that we think deserve discussion in the research community. Specifically, we argue that the item composition of the ASRS, a scale that has been developed and successfully used for progressive apraxia of speech, overlooks central features of apraxia of speech in stroke for reasons that are not convincing. CONCLUSIONS: The ASRS has made a substantial impact to the study of apraxia of speech by standardizing and explicating the diagnostic process, uncovering the potential subtypes of apraxia of speech, and stimulating further study and discussion about this area. However, it is our experience that modifications are needed to use it confidently with stroke populations.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US), University of Tartu (EE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.